Suddenly seeing more hexbear posts. Did we re-federate with them?

If so, was it polled somewhere?

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

1.2K comments

Which genocide is being denied by hexbear users?
- I had some conversations here. They were saying that China isn't doing anything to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang. That seems like genocide denial to me.
  
  Why are you linking an actual propaganda thinktank as an example as of Uyghur Genocide?
  You could link any source, but you link one that is staffed by people who's careers have been purely to lie about American's enemies and push American interests?? I hope you're a little sharper than that and you're just linking that because you hope other people will swallow anything.
  "HEY GUYS THIS ORGANIZATION THAT IS PAID TO TELL ME THAT CHINA IS BAD, GET THIS, SAYS CHINA IS BAD!!"
  Come on bud.
  
  You want the wiki?
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide
  
  Wikipedia? Unironically? You must be trolling
  
  It isn't the government, and the sources cited within are very good. Would you only accept China or Russia's word for it? Or are western sources okay?
  
  The sources cited are in large part Adrian Zenz and articles citing zenz. Radio free Asia shows up as well. How are these good sources?
  Not to mention that Wikipedia is known to have a huge right wing bias and a well-known Nazi problem
  I don't trust Chinese or Russian media either, I employ a healthy level of scepticism towards any media.
  
  Is there any way I can convince you China is sterilizing and reeducating massive numbers of people in interment camps against their will? It seems like you've just said everything is untrustworthy.
  
  Yes. If you can interact with and debunk the sources I've provided you and if you can provide first-hand sources such as official government papers detailing the CPCs sterilisation plans for Uyghur women, detailing how they plan to forcibly sterilize Uyghur women in order to eradicate their population.
  This would be comical, since the Uyghurs are one of the fastest growing populations in china. So somehow they would both be performing sterilisations and still having the population grow. Someone must've messed up.
  Now is there any way I can convince you to interact with the sources provided.
  
  official government papers
  What government? It seems like the website you cited disregarded sources because they were from governments. Do you need Chinese government documents specifically?
  
  Yes. Just as I would need us government papers if I were to prove the us government is deliberately committing a genocide. Now what can I do to make you interact with the sources?
  
  China is sterilizing
  I want you to think critically about this one. What people point to is an uptick in IUD insertions.
  We have seen what sterilization compaigns in other countries look like, such as forced hysterectomies in the US and chemical castration in Israel. IUDs are birth control, they don't sterilize the patient. An appropriately-trained doctor can safely remove one in just a few minutes and I don't think you even need equipment to do so!
  Literally even if we were imagining China was forcing women to get IUDs, which it isn't, that's not sterilizing them! Those women would not be sterilized!
  But this is part of the endless layers of warping and misrepresentation that make things go from "uptick in IUD insertions"
  to Zenz exaggerating the rate by a literal order of magnitude
  to hack journalists doing circular citations of Associated Press, etc. making sinister insinuations
  to people who don't follow this very closely saying "sterilizing"
  
  So temporarily sterilisation? The important question would be whether it is forced.
  
  Oh, I agree that in a vacuum that would be the more important thing, but I forgot to return to my first point: Given that this would be an extraordinarily poor way of doing forced sterilization and we know that from the many campaigns that we have decent documentation of, in the absence of solid evidence, concluding that this was "a forced sterilization campaign" does not seem reasonable. Like, in terms of everything from resilience to material waste, even just doing tube tyings (which effectively result in genuine sterilization in 1/4 of cases) would be much more effective. It's like saying they are trying to kill Uyghurs by promoting juggling in the hopes that they will bonk themselves in the head and stumble into traffic, it just isn't what such campaigns have ever looked like in practice.
  
  While I think nay accusation of genocide should be taken seriously and investigated, I do not think we should accept these claims without basis, and we have to accept that despite several years of allegations, no proof has been provided. Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang. Here's a carrd with mainly Western sources debunking the claims of genocide https://xinjiangahr.carrd.co/
  
  Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang
  That's very misleading. They say they have insufficient proof to say it is racially motivated. (Which is a prerequisite for genocide) But there is certainly great oppression happening there.
  
  Both organisations have acknowledged that there is at the worst a cultural genocide going on - ie. An erasure of culture.
  One can wonder how such a genocide is carried out, when the Uyghur language is still taught, Uyghur culture and language is still freely distributed and promoted and Uyghur people are a prominent part of the Chinese popular culture.
  Your claim leads me to believe you did not engage with the sources provided to you.
  
  Forced sterilisation (birth rates are down 60% vs about 10% for the rest of China) and forceful reeducation? They don't care about the language as much as the shared cultural identity separate from China.
  
  Birth rates were already much lower in the rest of China, did the Han do a genocide on themselves first lol or is declining birth rate the norm in a country with massively improved economic conditions and development, and has that begun to affect the more rural regions of China?
  
  That's why I clarified that there was a approx. 10% across the county vs a 60% decrease in that area.
  
  No, that isn’t a clarification. You’re not understanding that the birth rates in the rest of China were already much lower prior to the 10% decrease. The Uighur population has been growing even as the Han population has leveled out, because the Han already had lower birth rates for decades. The Uighur were exempted from the one child policy as well. So yeah, the rest decreased 10%, there was less room to decrease in the first place because birth rates were already very low!
  
  Did you even look at the carrd? If you're not gonna engage with the sources, then it's pretty clear you're not arguing in goog faith and there's no reason for this discussion to continue
  
  I'm trying to talk in good faith, but I don't have 10 hours to read about it. I've only researched about 1 or 2 hours. But I'm definitely not just taking your website at face value.
  If you want to call the discussion off, I'm fine with that. This thread has given an adequate sample of hexbear ideology.
  
  I'm trying to talk in good faith, but I don't have 10 hours to read about it. I've only researched about 1 or 2 hours. But I'm definitely not just taking your website at face value.
  Right, so you didn't read my carrd and then linked a different source instead (super good faith) that I completely refuted (apparently you felt no need to respond to my complete rebuttal]. So you didn't read the comment or the response to your rebuttal, and yet you're saying you're acting in good faith because you don't have a lot of time/haven't done a lot of research? Whatever, then don't act like you're qualified to have an opinion.
  But I'm definitely not just taking your website at face value.
  What does this even mean? "Face value"? It's a collection of sources. Seriously, if you don't have the knowledge to even respond to my points, much less my complete refutation of your own points, don't ghost respond to me acting like I've said something crazy to get support in another thread. It's cowardly and pathetic.
  
  Hey thanks for chiming in! I didn't notice it was the same user. It's pretty sad someone can be this resilient to challenging their own worldview. If they truly were so secure in their knowledge they would interact with the sources provided, yet they fail to do so. At some point you can only assume it's because they're afraid at some level.
  It's really disappointing
  
  Hey I'm glad to hear you point out the good faith stuff. I'm interacting with a few of your site buddies and I gotta say, there's a whole lot of bad faith stuff going on, so I'm sorta defensive. I've provided sources a few times now and just get mocked or called a propagandist for it. Not your fault though, so it is unfair to direct the frustration at you.
  I don't expect you to read it all in one go - there's a lot of stuff. We don't have to continue the conversation right now, we can pick it up when you're ready. I will say that I am not the one who gathered those sources, so beyond doing so e fact-checking and investigation on my own on these claims, I am not the most well-educated on the subject. We have a news mega, which is a great place for these exact discussions, which I would highly recommend. I can try to answer any questions you might have, though I think users like @SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net or @Alaskaball@hexbear.net would be much better for any question that isn't super basic. I'll do my best though, and I'm certain there's a lot I could learn. Again for any real in-depth discussion I'd recommend the news mega.
  Edit: nevermind you're the asshole troll that couldnt read a single source given to you in that thread before. Fuck me for assuming good faith and fuck you
  
  It is their fault. They lost an argument only to whine about me and others in another thread (after willfully ignoring my response to their points) and now they say they "don't have a lot of time" (they had time to write 400 responses and link multiple resources they didn't verify) when asked to read, that's textbook bad faith cowardice. This person you're responding to, JohnDclay, is the asshole lib from the 500 response thread.
  
  Lmao thanks for the heads up - what a pathetic dickhead
  
  lol
  
  Why would the CPC, in the same breath, exempt the Uyghurs from the One Child Policy but also force sterilization?
  
  Maybe? Then they can look like they're not limiting the population while doing it covertly.
  
  I'm Chinese and literally grew up with Uyghurs downstairs in Hubei, they and the Hui family around the block were the only ones with more than 1 kid.
  If you're referring to something Adrian Zenz said about 80% of new IUDs being sold in Xinjiang, he misread a decimal point 328,475 IUDs in Xinjiang out of 3,774,318. 8.7% of IUDs placed in China were in Xinjiang.
  News quoted his 80% figure before he had to retract it, but it's already in the back of people's minds that China's forcibly sterilizing Uyghurs.

1202 comments