Sexy French Depression Rule
Sexy French Depression Rule

Sexy French Depression Rule

okay so what the hell is going on with those legs
Seriously, she’s depressed and her legs are shaved?! Get real.
I do that!
Its a great opportunity to self harm a little.
When I have depression bouts, keeping my beard groomed and keeping my hair somewhat okay is one way for me to mitigate the damage.
If I look like shit, chances are I will feel like shit. If I at least put some effort in looking decent, its one less thing to talk shit about.
Never said she was depressed, only that they hit rock bottom.
You can be broke, have no friends, no job, no home, but still look at life positively.
They are mutually exclusive.
They're not wearing any pants. Very rare nowadays.
No underwear? Scandalous! At least show the ankle.
It's called inosculation.
I see what you mean after looking at it for a while. Now it looks like a chicken wish bone shape leg to leg glued on to one large leg coming from her lower waist
sometimes my legs can just do that, ok! 😭
So I scrolled by this for about the 6th time now and I can finally see where the two legs are separate. Is my brain broken?
Yep that’s some AI slop
I am going to sort of lay into you here, not because I want to be a jerk, but because I think it's important to post on public forums in advocacy of important steps in reasoning that I want to see society take.
You see, every time someone calls something "ai slop", and it isn't, it's a lot worse than just being wrong in one instance. It actually creates a compelling piece of evidence for exactly the opposite of the point you want to make. It's a particularly damaging form of wrongness.
You want to claim that what AI produces is intrinsically flawed, lesser than human works, and always bears the mark of its inferiority. You want to claim that human artwork is beautiful, superior, and always bears a mark of it. Roughly something like "the worst human artwork is better than the best AI slop".
But because you identified this human artwork (not just a random photograph even, but a still from a carefully directed successful TV show!) as "slop", you must now either admit to one of these things:
Or
I think, in light of this, it's time to move on from your current position, and instead take up a more nuanced one. Maybe consider that the problems with AI imagery are not about visual coherence, the presence of "soul" being put into it, or anything like that. You can still maintain the core view that AI imagery is bad, but you should come at it from a stronger argument, like the environmental impact, copyright violations, or something like that. This visual acuity argument is going the way of the dodo, and fast - as you and everyone else misclassifying real images as "slop" unintentionally demonstrate.
It's a scene from The Queens Gambit. I think Anya Taylor-Joy just does weird things with her limbs sometimes
It's a screenshot from The Queen's Gambit, not AI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Queen%27s_Gambit_(miniseries)
Confidently incorrect.
"ai slop" slop
This is a more accurate representation of a depressed woman.
I can fix her..
She can make me worse.
depressed? that's me 3 days every month.. depressed pr not lol
as a woman I can confirm that's how I spend my days. Very sad. Wish I could be hand washing some underwear and the dishes for a man. Oh well... we can't all have everything
You can wash my underwear if you want.
I'll buy you some cigarettes and wine in return.
Hot mess
That's just what wfh looks like
In her sadness, it seemed as if even her beautiful, beloved boobs bounced a little less boobily as she jiggled down the stairs...
Isn't this just basically Bridget Jones?
Written by a woman.