What are the silliest reasons people have given you for not wanting to try Linux?
The best one I've ever heard is they like the Microsoft wallpapers. Yes i told them you can use them on linux too. But they argued with me that they wouldn't be compatible.
You're viewing a single thread.
Most people's reasons in my experience demonstrate to me that they have a perception of Linux as it was 15+ years ago.
I discussed switching to Linux with a group of friends in a voice chat some time ago, most were fairly open to it, and one or two have switched since, but mainly their reasons were time constraints, not wanting to go through the process of backing up files, and finding alternative software.
One guy in particular brought up gaming, MS office, and some other particular software they used. I showed them protondb and every game they looked up was gold or higher, showed them libre office which they could not complain about since it generally works a lot nicer, and it turned out that other software was available as a .deb. After all of this, the reason they gave me was "but I like Windows".
Fair enough I guess, though they couldn't really produce the reason as to why.
Generally, people just don't like any kind of change, even if it has the potential to make them a lot happier.
not wanting to go through the process of backing up files
This was a big thing when I was helping some people with Windows 10s EOL, A lot of folks just don't have a 2nd drive to back stuff up onto.
As a compulsive data-hoarder the idea of having everything on a single drive with no backup plan, local or "cloud" based... Terrifying! You could write a horror movie about it.
I just quasi ran into storage issues. have 1 qnap with 16tb raid1... NTFS
I can't for the life of me get it to connect to Linux, detects it being connected, won't display as a drive.
I stupidly installed bazzite, which is stupidly restrictive (so I've learned) on fstab... found out after I had to boot into grub to edit fstab back since it wouldnt let me edit the file since bazzite revoked me root access? ok... that was the deal breaker for me (with bazzite, not Linux)
Okay hear me out... When you say all those words in a sentence, I have honestly no idea what you are saying. But furthermore it looks like it didn't work (or so I think). That is the reason why people (me included) don't dare to switch
It looks like a hassle, it takes time to learn, people don't want to back up 2 their files (I know, I don't get that either), they don't want to think about "bazzite" or "fstab", partition the drive for dual boot or search hours looking for a solution.
The people with no or limited knowledge about computers want to open their laptop, start edge or chrome (I know I know) and watch cat movies on Instagram.
I really wanna make the jump, but the unknown with all possible hassle is holding me back.
And apparently mint is super easy, but it will take time and courage!
People like to recommend immutable distros like bazzite because in theory they're much harder to break, but in reality they are a niche community and are nowhere ready for primetime for casual users
can confirm. I can understand how to make things work as I need it to in Linux, but I figured I'd try bazzote because people were saying how great it is. knowing how to manipulate Linux how I want, and using bazzite because very annoying because of the restrictions which I didn't read about before hand. I wasn't blaming Linux as a whole, just bazzitr specifically for trying to protect me. essentially they let me break it, but wouldn't let me fix it.
Really it depends what you use your computer for. If you're a casual user, and all you do is browse the web, watch videos, and play games, the transition is no worse than moving from Windows to Mac. There are some small quirks to get used to, but anybody should be able to figure out 90% of it in a matter of minutes.
Well, except you don't need to pay hundreds of dollars for the Apple thing. That's a steep transition to me.
When you say all those words in a sentence, I have honestly no idea what you are saying.
ya know. I've read this a lot directed at me.. I clearly have a communication issue. I'll reread everything and try to figure myself out .
I understand your words but I also get this. Guess we are the same 🙃
It surprises me that there are users like that that haven't yet gone through some kind of major data loss event. Or maybe they've only used a computer for a couple years...
Edit: not those with archives, those with a single disc of course.
If you ever talk to someone who's worked in a place offering data recovery. They've probably met a lot of people who've gone through exactly that.
After all of this, the reason they gave me was "but I like Windows".
This is the response I normally get as well, which infuriates me to no end, because it isn't an actual reason, it is ultimately their decision, and I feel like they are making a mistake out of laziness or perceived comfort.
Whenever they say "... but I like Windows." I'm like: Ah so you like CandyCrush ads on your homescreen. Got it. Yeah who doesn't like to look at some ads first thing in the morning.
"but I like Windows"
I can't imagine any better reason to use Windows than that.
but they don't know the alternatives
like a child who only eats one type of food but never even touched others
I still can't imagine any better reason.
because you haven't tried the alternatives
tbf it is hard to try new things, especially initially
It's my opinion that most people think of all the technology as it were 15 years ago. Apple was innovative, Google wasn't evil, Windows worked well, and Linux was not as accessible as it is today.
I had two bouts with Linux in the distant past, and neither time did I think Linux was anything worth pursuing. Not that it was bad, I just didn't see a benefit over the alternatives. In fact the alternatives had all the benefits in my mind.
When I switched a year ago, I was blown away how far it had come as far as being accessible. Now I can't imagine using Windows as my primary OS ever again.
I think for the MS Office thing, it depends on what it’s being used for. If it’s just creating a fresh document or editing a simple existing docx, LibreOffice it totally fine; I’ve heavily exclusively used LibreOffice Writer during my time in college and been okay, as I’m either just writing in MLA or using a provided Word file that I can then just save as an ODT after initial conversion and export as a PDF when it comes time to turn it in.
However, from what I can tell, if you’re working in an organization that extensively uses MS Office, files may need to survive multiple openings and edits between multiple editors, and multiple cycles of translating between document representations can lead to degraded documents and just make your work life absolutely miserable. Thus, LibreOffice isn’t an option, though I hear there are more MS-compatible suites that are usable on Linux, though not all of them FOSS.
This is why I’ve so far left my mother alone about Linux; maybe if I saw some evidence that her workflow would be more amenable to LibreOffice than I think it is, I’d reconsider.
I just had the damnest experience with Office. Some institution required me to deliver a "doc" document with it's respective PDF. I'm a Linux user, so there was gonna be some trouble. This document was viewed and edited by several instances, so I decided to use an online tool. Google Docs it was, but this was before the doc requirement. So, after the fact, my solution was similar: to just use the online version of Office, which I had access to through my job. Cool. Well, no. Delivered the document and the doc wasn't consistent with the Office desktop they were using. Long story short I had to figure out their Office version and borrow a computer with the same Office desktop version they were using, pirated, of course.
My experience with LibreOffice is it works fine if you're doing straightforward things by yourself. MLA formatted essay? "Twelve point double-spaced Times New Roman or you get a zero" and they never noticed my papers were Liberation Sans? Sure that works. "Pick a partner and make a 20 slide PowerPoint presentation" is a nightmare because sharing files back and forth between Powerpoint and Impress doesn't work very well.
The more usable solution to that is Google Docs. I had a group project with four other guys, and we were all sat around a table typing in the same document at the same time on three different operating systems. Played perfectly well with Windows, Mac and Linux. Us Linux nerds who hate "the cloud" because "someone else's computer" and Google because "Don't Be Evil" kind of lurch at that one, but it functions.