@silence7 they claim it's a coding error, but maybe it's a deliberate coding error?
Or maybe they just wanted to update the "explanation" part of those sections, but doing so being the build.
@AlphaOmega
It's not just that -- it has markup explanations/comments.
Imagine if someone was told to change the explanation of those particular sections -- they could totally have made some change that accidentally made those parts unrendered.
Some static site generators silently drop template sections that have errors, for example.
Of course, this theory still requires that someone told someone to change what those sections say, which seems plausible enough...
Hard to buy the idea that they accidentally removed the exact same parts from the page containing the full copy, the page containing just Article 1, and the links to said parts.
Like, that's a pretty unlikely coincidence if it was just an accident...