Should visitors to a country (tourist / visa-holders / people staying temporarily) have the right to criticize the government?/When should an immigrant have the right to criticize the government?

The common MO amongst right wingers is they claim that dissidents like Mahmoud Khalil is a "guest" and therefore they believe that he should not have the right to criticize the government.

What is your view on this?

Edit: Mr. Khalil has a Green Card btw, just to clarify.

You're viewing a single thread.

33 comments

Since it's clear we're talking about the US here, the 1st Amendment clearly states (emphasis added):
Congress shall make no law respecting ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
It says nothing about citizens, tourists, foreign nationals, etc. In fact, the amendment only limits what Congress can do (and the Supremacy clause extends this to the states). It doesn't say "Citizens have the right to free speech." It says "Congress shall pass no laws abridging the freedom of speech."
It's pretty clear that anyone and everyone has the right to free speech and assembly. The right wingers you're talking about are trying to rewrite the first amendment to justify their fascism.

33 comments