American Veterans ๐ซก๐ฆ
๐ธ๐บ๐ธ
American Veterans ๐ซก๐ฆ ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ
American Veterans ๐ซก๐ฆ ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ
You're viewing a single thread.
The predicted Allied casualties for a mainland invasion of Japan were so high, especially with regard to the civilian fanaticism witnessed throughout the Island-hopping Campaign, the right choice was using the Atomic Bomb. After use of the first atomic bomb, when Japan failed to yield and refused to surrender, the return to consideration to a homeland invasion, along with running the numbers of anticipated Allied casualties, made using the second Atomic Bomb the correct choice. The best choice was made, with regard to the information on hand at the time.
The predicted Allied casualties for a mainland invasion of Japan were so high
Those estimates were made after the fact, in response to criticism. In reality, a mainland invasion was never in the cards at all. It's a myth. There's nothing about it in any of the letters or journals of the people making the decisions. There were two actual alternatives to the bomb:
The decision was all about prestige and politics and not sharing the spotlight. It wasn't necessary.
This is a very long video about it but it's very informative and well sourced.
I'm not interested in your American propaganda protecting American innocence.
the right choice was using the Atomic Bomb.
Least rabid and bloodthirsty imperial dog
You think killing anywhere from 150,000 to 246,000 civilians to kill 10,000 military personnel is good?