1y ago

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from accurately answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds

fortune.com Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from accurately answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds

The chatbot gave wildly different answers to the same math problem, with one version of ChatGPT even refusing to show how it came to its conclusion.

Can we discuss how it's possible that the paid model (gpt4) got worse and the free one (gpt3.5) got better? Is it because the free one is being trained on a larger pool of users or what?

Technology @lemmy.world

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from accurately answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds

fortune.com /2023/07/19/chatgpt-accuracy-stanford-study/

250 41

You're viewing a single thread.

41 comments

Is there some award for being the very last person to post this in this community or something? This has been discussed to death about a dozen times already.
- Finally the last thing missing from that other site has made it here...
  
  Lmao
- Ok, maybe there is too much chatgpt spam in tech subs (and other even worse topics, like social media company meltdowns). What do you want to discuss then? You have zero posts so far.
  
  You're right, I have zero posts so far, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make there though. Perhaps you think everyone should keep posting the same thing ad nauseam?
  As soon as I find "something I want to discuss" I'll be sure to post it. Until then I'll just keep browsing past the same things that keep being posted time and again here.
  
  I'm not making any point, I want to know what you want to discuss instead of this. Maybe it's something I haven't thought about. What is a worthy c/technology material to you that does not get enough attention?

41 comments