3mo ago

Australia to ban life insurance companies from discriminating based on genetic testing results

www.theguardian.com Australia to ban life insurance companies from discriminating based on genetic testing results

Albanese government says people have been reluctant to get life-saving early testing because of the risk of being refused insurance

Life insurance companies will be banned from discriminating against people based on genetic testing under federal government moves designed to encourage greater use of predictive technology in preventive health.

The assistant treasurer, Stephen Jones, will announce on Wednesday that life insurers will be banned from using predictive genetic testing results in their underwriting assessments.

“This change will give Australians the confidence to undertake genetic testing without fear it will impact their ability to access financial security through life insurance,” Jones said in comments provided before the formal announcement.

You're viewing a single thread.

11 comments

My father was right. It didn't matter how much I lied on my resume. My real C.V. was in my cells. Why should anyone invest all that money to train me when there are a thousand other applicants with far cleaner profiles.
Of course it's illegal to discriminate; "Genoism" they call it. But no one takes the laws seriously. If you refuse to disclose, they can always take a sample from a doorhandle, or a handshake. Even the saliva off your application form. And if all else fails, a perfectly legal drug test can just as easily become an illegal peek at your future in the company.
This movie stands as one of the most prescient I've ever watched. It's a shame that Nicols later works never matched it, and that this movie itself is somewhat forgotten.
- Are drug tests in a company that normal there? Unimaginable here.
- It's Niccol. I was briefly confused and thought that I somehow missed Nichelle Nichols in Gattaca.
  That said, is Gattaca forgotten? And what was wrong with his later works? I haven't seen them all, but the ones I've seen have been pretty good. They're all pretty much a bleak and dire warning about our future, and Gattaca may have done it best, but there's nothing wrong with his other films.
  
  I think Lord of War and Anon were his best post Gattaca. In Time was pretty "meh" in my opinion, but watchable, and the rest were forgettable.
  I misspoke a bit. I don't mean that his other works are garbage by any means. In fact I quite liked Lord of War and Anon. Just meant that they never really hit the same depth of messaging that Gattaca seemed to hit.

11 comments