1y ago

Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk

apnews.com Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk

A judge has imposed a limited gag order on President Donald Trump after he disparaged a key court staffer during his civil business fraud trial.

How long do you think it will take before Trump violates the order?

News @lemmy.world

New York judge issues limited gag order after Trump makes disparaging post about court clerk

apnews.com /article/trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-new-york-371675a2482c1de01f516f29b5a43d33

137 3

You're viewing a single thread.

33 comments

Limited? Why? I don't get it. Why are they being so lenient with him?
- To avoid a First Amendment fight. Generally speaking, gag orders are on less sure footing than most people realize; they really do run up against prior restraint concerns. There's actually a fair amount of legal debate over them but the vast majority of defendants don't have the wherewithal, or a compelling reason, to really fight them; Trump does. So judges are likely leery of issuing too broad a gag order on him for fear of being overturned, which they never want anyway, and thereby setting a precedent that weakens all judges' ability to issue future gag orders.
  
  Thank you for this explanation. I think it is important context to the discussion that needs to be spread far and wide so everyone better understands the legal calculus rather than getting mad because they think the judicial system is taking it easy on him.
  
  The judicial system is taking it easy on him because he's rich* and powerful and will throw a tantrum whatever happens.
  Here's a Tennessee judge who has prohibited these people from discussing their case at all or sharing the footage they obtained legally on cases that have been dismissed.
  https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/09/27/coffee-county-judge-denies-request-by-georgia-man-to-share-footage-of-traffic-stop/
  Thousands of gag orders are issued from the bench that nobody hears about because there aren't news reporters covering every courtroom in the country. Trump is getting special treatement because our justice system is inherently unjust.
  
  I know the judicial system is taking it easy on him.
  AG Garland can go on TV 1000 more times and tell me he treats all cases equally, it's still a lie.
  
  There is still internal politics in apolitical institutions. You are shitting on Merrick Garland for taking the measured approach, but to do anything else would simply add further fuel to the fire of the vindictive psycopathy of the christo-fascist cult. The right way to exhume Donald Trump from politics is through the slow, methodical, dispassionate legal process of boiling him alive on full public display until he finally breaks.
  This was only ever going to work via imploying the "death by a thousand cuts" war-gaming that we are seeing. If you thought it was ever going to work via shock and awe or judicial blitzkrieg then you are beyond naive. If you are results oriented rather than emotionally motivated then I would think you could see that rather than yelling about some perceived lack of balls & strikes justice that does not exist in the real world.
  
  Garland deliberately obstructed any investigation into Trump (or speaking his name out loud in front of him) over J6 until the Hutchinson testimony humiliated both the FBI and him.
  As much as people would like to pretend he didn't, Garland sandbagged like hell to protect Trump. Reporting is that it was because he didn't want to seem political.
  And it's really past time to encourage appeasement of MAGA rage. They will be angry regardless. There is no "right way" to behave that they will accept.
- They apparently realize the implicit dangers of making a martyr out of a moron. It seems like the prevailing wisdom is to continue to give him enough tether to hang himself. For the record, I'm not sure I necessarily agree with that strategy, but I do understand it.
- From what I've been reading the judges involved do not want to create any First Amendment issues.
  
  From what I have seen, judges can do whatever the fuck they want in regards to a case and especially in their own courtroom.
  
  Yep. Only because it's Trump and his massive cult of sycophants that they are using baby gloves with him.
  Wish they had the balls to actually treat him like they would literally any other criminal. But I guess its better to try to avoid another Jan. 6th.
  
  In some sick way, I would like to see them attempt another "rebellion". There absolutely won't be a minimal police force waiting for them this time around. Seeing those idiots go up against a proper riot force might be interesting to watch.
  However, I understand that the risks outweigh the potential entertainment value. No more lives need to be lost or destroyed over this garbage.
- They want 10ft of rope, not 10”.
- The judge always has a duty to avoid appellate issues and therefore judges tend to be very lenient to make sure this case is done for good at the end of the court process.
  And just because ppl say this is a trump thing, NO. Sam Bankman-Fried, is one of a lot of other prominent cases where they have been swaths of leniency as well.

33 comments