You're viewing a single thread.
Awesome, now they just need to consider the judges an enemy of the country so they can ignore or remove them
I upvoted, but on reflection, I can't tell if this was sarcasm (which is why I up voted) or if it's sincere (which in that case, fuck off)...
It is sarcasm. I... expected not to have to say it but in hindsight I realize that the amount of people that would say it seriously is so high I should have added the /s
They have largely been complying with court orders thus far. I get the sentiment, but repeating this is just normalizing the idea of them majorly violating court orders when we need there to be strong push back if they do
They want you to be apthatic and think nothing will work so you stop fighting back
The court orders are a temporary roadblock. Trump will either fire the judges or appeal to the Supreme Court.
Judges can't be fired - they have to be removed via impeachment which requires 67 in the senate. Republicans only have 53 in the senate
SCOTUS is insane but they have their own agenda that doesn't always align with trump. They often have and keep ruling against him in a good number of cases. They are far more selective on when to be insane
Fight every fight. It's not over at all
Judges can't be fired
And trump can't unilaterally shutter departments funded by congress. How's that going so far?
This is an absurdly ignorant comment.
Why do judges, elected from the country or put into positions from elected officials and confirmed by a representative body have to do with mega billionaires ?
Federal judges are appointed, and they have lifetime positions, just like SCOTUS.
Parent commenter is describing what the administration is likely to continue doing. They've already paid little heed to federal injunctions against them. They've already started calling federal judges into question.