Why United Does Not Allow You To Use In-Flight Screen As Extended Display
Why United Does Not Allow You To Use In-Flight Screen As Extended Display
Confidentiality. Or porn. One of those things.
You're viewing a single thread.
I just want to know when I can connect my noise-cancelling Bluetooth headphones to the display instead of the tinny pair of wired "maraccas" that I keep in my travel bag.
Idk, 150 people in a tin can all using Bluetooth could cause issues.
It would be better to get noise cancelling headphones with a 3.5mm headphone jack. I had some until my daughter broke them, and I loved them.
Loads of people use Bluetooth devices on airplanes already. Are there any reports of destructive interference as is?
Idk. But from my experience, it's usually something like 20 people (me included). If you made that the default way to connect, I think more people would use them.
Or maybe it's not an issue, idk. I don't know a ton about Bluetooth and airplanes.
I've been on budget flights where in flight infotainment was an app on your phone that connects to a media server on the plane itself. Everyone was using Bluetooth and there are no issues.
I would expect a plan to have a lot more than 20 people watching something on their phone with AirPods (or a clone thereof). Just about everyone that's watching or listening to something on their phone nowadays is using BT headphones, because most phones don't have 3.5mm jacks anymore.
Also consider smart watches.
If it could, planes would be dropping right and left. It hasn't been an issue in several decades
Number of stews who have the time to help you figure out the pairing rigamarole or why the radio on this unit is fucked: ZERO.
Number of issues with regular fucking headphones: zero.
Cases where the tinniness will impact your enjoyment of visual spooge: zero
People stopping you from buying some $15 apple 3.5mm pods for your earballs: zero
I'm thinking you'll be fine. Leave the air safety officers alone so they can do their job.
3.5mm earphones don't block 85db of plane noise
The ones that seal do provide sound isolation
And they're lots of fun when there's a cabin announcement.
I don't care about them, the seatbelt light is either on or off, don't bother me with what the temperature is at our destination
It doesn't work that way. They're piped through all audio channels at maximum volume.
Don't care, gaming on my steam deck
Most over-ear noise cancelling headphones I've seen have a 3.5mm input that works with the noise cancelling.
Yet I haven't heard of an earphone with this functionality
What? My 20 years of flying regularly with 3.5mm headphones must have been a very long hallucination.
I said earphones and you're talking about headphones
They make both.
edit: insult was unnecessary.
I haven't found a single model of wired noise canceling earphones in existence
And because you haven't found them, they must not exist?
By earphones I mean in-ear models. Maybe there is some weird over-ear model with that feature, but when IEMs add the Bluetooth feature, the cord gets cut from the design
Damn, you're right. For many years I used the Bose Quiet Comfort 20, but those aren't made anymore. There are still some options but none of them look great. The major brands just stopped making them. Ironically the first pair I found was USB-C with an adapter.
@iopq @thresholddweller There's been quite a few wired earbuds with ANC over the years. Not many now though. I would imagine they sound like a dreadful compromise.
I wouldn't call it quite a few, you can count them on one hand
On the other hand, there's thousands of TWS
Number of stews who have the time to help you figure out the pairing rigamarole or why the radio on this unit is fucked: ZERO.
No help necessary. Leave it as an advanced option and provide those who request assistance a cheap pair of 3.5 mm headphones. SOLVED.
Number of issues with regular fucking headphones: zero.
Cases where the tinniness will impact your enjoyment of visual spooge: zero
I'm sorry you're not able to appreciate hifi sound but that's a a you problem.
People stopping you from buying some $15 apple 3.5mm pods for your earballs: zero
Those sound like shit compared to the expensive pair of wireless ear buds that I already own.
I’m thinking you’ll be fine. Leave the air safety officers alone so they can do their job.
Of course I'm fine. But what's this nonsense about bothering air safety officers? Nobody is berating airline employees about bluetooth headphones lol.
Found these pretty quickly.
The second we get a better short range wireless protocol so there aren't a hundred Bluetooth devices jamming each other on the plane.
If you travel a lot they do make airplane headphones that have a 3.5mm connector and run noise cancelling.
I've been on budget flights where the in-flight infotainment was an app on your phone which connects to a media server on the plane. Everyone was watching with Bluetooth headphones and there were no issues.
The budget airline handed out wireless headphones?
No, you bring your own.
So... I'm pretty sure the entire plane wasn't on Bluetooth headphones then.
And the entire plane wouldn't be on Bluetooth headphones if the in-flight infotainment systems supported it as an option so what's your point?
You don't engineer a system with such an obvious fail state.
I disagree that its an obvious fail state. Surely with all of these airlines flying thousands of passengers, where users watch infotainment on their own devices, mostly with bluetooth, we'd have at least a handful or reports of spotty bluetooth on flights, right? Where are they, then?
People do run into problems. It's well known that too many Bluetooth devices in a small area can jam each other. It's not an on/off switch, it's increasing amounts of interference in the signal. So it appears as interruptions in audio/video or unintended noise.
I'd like to inform myself on this topic more. Have you found any discussions or observations that you could link to, by chance?
They make a thing for that.