Voting for the lesser evil is still evil
Voting for the lesser evil is still evil
You're viewing part of a thread.
Show Context
308 comments
-
Advocating voting for a lesser evil could be considered harmful, though.
Why?
-
Because it suggests that it's sufficient for progressive change.
-
I don't think it does.
Don't get me wrong. I know people who want to believe voting is all that is necessary for progressive change, but they are wrong.
Edit: How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?
-
How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?
I said advocatingy for voting...
-
Ok how does advocating for voting for the lesser evil suggest that voting for the lesser evil is sufficient for progressive change? Is that better?
-
It suggests that people need to vote for progressive change and that congludes their options to enact power on the system.
-
Yeah, that makes some sense. But you could just tell people that voting for the lesser evil alone is not enough, you also need to organize. I feel like that is pretty clear. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.
-
-
-
-
-
-
308 comments