Voting for the lesser evil is still evil
Voting for the lesser evil is still evil
You're viewing part of a thread.
Show Context
308 comments
-
So the only way to keep and maintain a progressive government is to teleport from where we are now to the desired outcome? Is that the argument of the video?
If so, that seems not currently feasible.
-
Maybe you should watch it, then you don't have to ask such an ignorant question.
-
Sounds like you aren't clear on what that video is suggesting either. Why should I spend time to watch a video that no one seems to have understood?
-
I'm quite clear: electoral politics is merely a distraction for left/progressive forces. Rather, you should organize with your fellow exploited siblings and built opposing power structures from the bottom up.
He demands the opposite than wishful thinking, or "teleporting".
-
Is there a succinct way of articulating why we can't do both? (e.g. vote for the lesser evil while also doing all the mutual aid and whatnot that we can?) Does it boil down to the argument that voting makes people less likely to build said alternative power structures?
I'll watch the video when I have time, but communicating an actionable strategy I think is essential to folks in crisis.
-
Is there a succinct way of articulating why we can't do both?
You can, if you want to. Just don't waste your time on electoral politics.
but communicating an actionable strategy I think is essential to folks in crisis.
Yes. Organizing is an actionable strategy.
-
Horses and water and drinking and whatnot
-
-
-
Ok, so why not vote for the lesser evil then? It would increase the amount of time we have to organize without fascists cracking down on us.
-
The fascists have already been cracking down on people trying to organize.
-
So your solution is defeatism?
A bold strategy, let's see how it pays off. /s
-
Yes! Why not vote for the lesser evil to prevent harsher crackdowns than you would otherwise get?
-
Because it doesn't prevent anything.
-
At the end, yes, both outcomes are the same unless organization is successful. Why make organizing any harder than it needs to be?
-
-
-
-
-
I'm not arguing against voting. I'm claiming that it's not a valid strategy. You can partake, if you really want to.
-
Ok, this could just be me getting lost in the comment chain. To be clear you don't think voting for the lesser evil is harmful, but you also don't think it is a valid strategy. If that is true, I see no inconstancies in your arguments.
-
Pretty much. Since electoralism is inconsequential for progressive change: vote if you want.
Advocating voting for a lesser evil could be considered harmful, though.
-
Advocating voting for a lesser evil could be considered harmful, though.
Why?
-
Because it suggests that it's sufficient for progressive change.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
308 comments