You're viewing a single thread.
-
It's a given you want money. The question is why this job vs another? If you don't stand out from the 100 other applicants then they'll take whoever will accept the lowest pay or whoever has the most charm.
If you come off as desperate then they might try to lowball you
-
Sure, but depending on the field, there is no difference from one job to another. I can do data analysis on your engine, your electrical grid, your stupid app. It's all numbers to me. Going through the motions of pretending I was called by destiny for your company is insulting to both of us. Same category as a damned cover letter. I had ChatGPT write whatever I thought would get me in the door and you honestly shouldn't trust a single one ever.
If you can find that special someone that really does have a thing for your company, neat. Otherwise, maybe don't use this question because you're probably just going to learn how well the applicant can brown nose. There are plenty of interview questions to choose from that might yield useful data.
-
"Otherwise, maybe don't use this question because you're probably just going to learn how well the applicant can brown nose. There are plenty of interview questions to choose from that might yield useful data."
The comic is about this specific question, so all else being equal, if I have to choose between someone that responds like you did and someone with any hint of friendliness, then I know who I would rather work with...
-
Yeah, if someone is being a cunt and saying that, sure. Most people have the good sense to be friendly during an interview and if they can't manage that, I have no defense for them.
But you don't even need this question to judge friendliness. The question is completely worthless and is very "dance monkey dance". I asks the applicant to degrade themselves by lying to your face about some higher meaning for no useful information to the interviewer. As I said, there are way better questions to ask.
-
I dont find this question degrading because its so common and rote. It has a prescribed answer, like all the rest of the "top ten interview questions."
They will get the same blank answer they expect to the blank question they asked and we can both smile and nod and pretend this interview isn't just a basic skills test cloaked in a vibes check like all the rest.
Interviews are play acting from all parties involved. Its all pretend, done generally by people that arent really practiced at it, so there is no reason to take it personally.
-
I can accept the song and dance interpretation of things, but contest that it isn't degrading and ultimately either useless or arguably detrimental. To go as extreme as possible: slavery was once common and rote and that did not make it anything less than a dehumanizing crime against humanity. Being common does not make it OK. There are better options and holding on to things because that's how it's always been is a fallacy.
To follow up, and reveal my own biases, the song and dance is hard for many people who are neurodivergent (and presumably some subset of neurotypicals, but I can't really speak from experience there). I'm a bad liar. It's one thing to selectively pick facts and let people make assumptions (which I'm meh at at best, and need prep for and don't enjoy doing) and another to openly make shit up on the fly (or have your bullshit prepared in advance). And for people such as myself that are bad at and uncomfortable with directly lying, despite my qualifications, now I'm screwed because society values dishonesty for some deeply stupid reason. And just riding the wave at this point: is incentivizing brown nosing and lying really what we want? Because that seems like a bad incentive.
-
Comparing the mundane small talk and boring back and forth of an interview to the shattering evil of slavery is well past extreme. These two things should not be compared in any context.
Youre not alone in being nuerodivergent. It was realizing that the interview process is an act, with orchestrated motions, that makes it approachable. Its not about lying or being lied to. Its a series of motions that repeat basicslly everywhere. You can learn and practice these motions, because they are so repetitive, and become very good at them.
Literally read off and practice answers to common interview questions. Any "top 10" or "top 100" guide. Have an answer to each of them, and practice them. You'll be stunned how often they come up, and how much easier interviews get. You still wont get every job, but you'll come through as a much better candidate in most cases.
-
You left the conditions for "acceptable behavior" as "common and rote". The point of the extremity was to demonstrate that this is a bad definition. Your revulsion to the comparison would indicate you understand this on some level, though that assertion is flimsier.
Well yeah, of course you can look up the questions and plan out answers. Hell, many of the questions are useful to ask. And get good results. I would further recommend that to prospective interviewees in spite of the heartburn the idea gives me. I'll play the damned game but that doesn't mean it doesn't rub me the wrong way. Familiarity does not necessarily breed comfort. Sometimes all you get is resignation to an unpleasant task. But that wasn't my point.
The point was this particular, common question is insulting and demeaning to everyone involved for no value to the interviewer and that the only plausible justification for it boils down to "its tradition" (which is a stupid reason to keep it) and further incentivizes character features that I hazard are socially detrimental (brown nosing and lying are not typically positive traits).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-