1y ago

FBI Hired Social Media Surveillance Firm That Labeled Black Lives Matter Organizers “Threat Actors”

theintercept.com FBI Hired Social Media Surveillance Firm That Labeled Black Lives Matter Organizers “Threat Actors”

A new Senate report calls out the FBI for lying to Congress about its social media monitoring, pointing out the FBI’s hiring of ZeroFox.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1111823

A new Senate report calls out the FBI for lying to Congress about its social media monitoring, pointing out the FBI’s hiring of ZeroFox.

Intelligence @lemmy.ml

FBI Hired Social Media Surveillance Firm, ZeroFox, That Labeled Black Lives Matter Organizers “Threat Actors”

theintercept.com /2023/07/06/fbi-social-media-surveillance-zerofox/

1 0

Socialism @beehaw.org

FBI Hired Social Media Surveillance Firm That Labeled Black Lives Matter Organizers “Threat Actors”

theintercept.com /2023/07/06/fbi-social-media-surveillance-zerofox/

1 1

News @lemmy.world

FBI Hired Social Media Surveillance Firm that Labeled Black Lives Matter Organizers “Threat Actors”

theintercept.com /2023/07/06/fbi-social-media-surveillance-zerofox/

82 17

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

31 comments

man, I guess the annual (at least) police killings of unarmed black people (including at least 2-3 children) just didn't happen?
- Do you know what the definition of systemic racism means? I think few people here do. It means there are laws and policies that are racist.
  You will always have racist cops and neighbors and teachers. That is not systemic. That is just shitty people. Once you identify them and can prove it, then you can take action. Some always slip thru.
  
  this is a weird take; aren't police literally the arbiters of said systemically racist policies and laws?
  like isn't that their colloquial job definition?
  
  Systemic or institutional racism is defined as having official policy in place to encourage racism. That was certainly the case in the 60s. Systemic being the key word I don't think people understand.
  We have the opposite of that now in that we have all kinds of laws to l that can be used against those that are proven to be racist within their job. Key world is that it has to be proven and often that is not obvious to after an incident.
  But if you think we have a problem with systemic racism, tell me one policy or law that is encourages racism.
  
  you're really not going to accept that systematic racism (gentrification, the War on Drugs, racial profiling, job discrimination, etc.) exists unless there's like literally a law that says "you should be racist" in big colorful letters, are you?
  I'm honestly in disbelief that people like you, who think that racism was completely solved in the 60s when King did the famous speech, still exist
  
  That is literally the definition of systemic.
  
  You will always have racist cops and neighbors and teachers. That is not systemic.
  If the system does not prevent, stop, or punish the racist constituent actors (cops, neighbors, teachers), is it not racist? Is it not systemic racism to not stop individual acts of racism, especially when they're performed by agents of the state (e.g., cops, lawmakers, judges, teachers)? Just because it's not a top-down demand by the state of "you, agent of the state, must act racist" does not mean it's not systemic racism.
  That is just shitty people.
  There is no such thing as a system as such. It's just people. If the members are racist, and their collective doesn't do anything to address (or even occasionally rewards) that behavior, the system is racist.

31 comments