Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris, paper reports
The Washington Post planned to endorse Kamala Harris over Donald Trump before owner Jeff Bezos, the Amazon founder, decided against it, the newspaper reported.
You're viewing a single thread.
Everyone talking about billionaires and how they endorse, support, finance, fund, hold lotteries to influence an election and everyone still thinks they exist in a democracy.
It's an oligarchy or a plutocracy
Call it whatever you want ... but it certainly isn't a democracy
It is only a democracy if kamala wins
It only continues to be a democracy if Kamala wins.
It's not a democracy if the choices available don't work for the common person, which they both don't. Democracy means that what the majority says, goes. Which is clearly not what's happening, because the majority wants to get rid of billionaires and do something about climate change and so on and so on.
How would you propose we stop the imminent and terminal influx of right wing fascism across the globe?
Because it is not waiting around while you organize a better third option. It's here. Now.
It's naive to think the US is a democracy. It's mostly an oligarchy with a few democratic features. The only choice is to vote Harris, but she is only barely less right-wing than Trump, from a European perspective. She will continue the oligarchy.
The only hope there is, is that all the people in the US start to understand they don't have a democracy. The vote for D needs to become overwhelming. Then, R will die out and an alternative choice on the further left side may emerge as a serious contender. Then, this further left choice needs to become overwhelming.
Eventually, this will lead to real change.
Why this must work like this is because the US' democratic system only supports 2 parties with its first-past-the-post system. Until a reform of this voting system takes place, towards a ranked choice style system, there can't be good representation. While any organization into a limited number of parties inherently means that almost no one will be represented perfectly, the less parties there are, the more the average divergence of reprentation there will be. 2 is just an unbelievably small number of opinion groupings to choose from, much too little to get anywhere near good representation.
I completely agree.
Is this democracy in the room with us right now?
Just go vote.