You're viewing a single thread.
-
Both Oracle and Postgres have pretty good support for json in SQL.
-
and the plane in the picture is perfectly capable of transporting a plane. What's your point?
-
JSON in the DB isn't an antipattern. It is frequently used in absolutely terrible designs but it is not itself a bad thing.
I'm a data architect and I approve this message.
-
Carrying the body of a smaller plane in a larger plane isn't an antipattern either. Airbus does this between body assembly and attaching the wings.
-
I think plane people call it a fusilage, because they're weird and like French.
-
It’s "fuselage".
It’s called like that because of it came from the word "forme fuselé" (Tapered shape) and it’s a french word mainly because we created it in 1908.
You’re welcome :-)
-
-
-
Why not use nosql if your important data is stored in JSON? You can still do all your fancy little joins and whatnot.
-
Turn it inside out. Why not use a RDBMS with a NoSQL bit added on the side?
-
Specifically so you get mature transactional guarantees, indices and constraints that let app developers trust your db.
-
-
-
-
-