Skip Navigation

Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world Porto881 @lemmy.world 10mo ago

Cum

You're viewing a single thread.

30 comments

it’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
- ha ha your mom hock my cum every night thru my jorts lol gottem
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation#
  
  In this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.
  
  Right?
  
  I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
  
  Yeah, that’s what I mean.
  
  The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
- I think you might mean "post hoc…" which is a more specific case of "cum hoc…" and sets focus on time/order of events

30 comments