You're viewing a single thread.
Nightwatch Admin @feddit.nl The absolute beauty of this: readers adding context without denying the actual content of the message. Glorious.
127 2 Replybalderdash @lemmy.zip
Remember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I'm sure they're saying the same thing about AI right now.
20 3 Replyuzay @infosec.pub The difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well
33 0 ReplyAA5B @lemmy.world A more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”
7 1 ReplyFeathercrown @lemmy.world Well, we do have AI that cites sources now, but it's still not completely accurate.
3 3 Replydeegeese @sopuli.xyz
I remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.
16 0 ReplyFeathercrown @lemmy.world I mean, of course. For the record, that wasn't the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn't be immune to hallucinations even if it was.
4 3 Reply
pHr34kY @lemmy.world Yeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won't always have a calculator in my pocket.
8 0 Reply4am @lemm.ee I mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol
11 0 ReplyGreyEyedGhost @lemmy.ca Learn how to do math in your head for the sheer pleasure of it, instead!
8 0 Reply