10mo ago

Pro-Palestinian protesters block traffic on Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco

www.cbsnews.com Pro-Palestinian protesters block traffic on Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco

A pro-Palestinian protest action briefly blocked all traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco Wednesday morning.

Starting at about 7:45 a.m. Protesters stopped cars and stretched banners across the roadway denouncing Israel's bombing of Rafah in the Gaza Strip and demanding that the U.S. stop arming Israel.

Northbound and southbound traffic on the bridge was at a standstill as of 8 a.m.

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

249 comments

Their goal is not to eradicate the world of Palestinians and their culture. They could care less of their existence. It’s a territorial war. Period.
Always has been. You can spin it however you want. But as atrocious as it is- it’s not genocide.
By the way… “plausible” doesn’t mean…. “Run with it!”
- Netanyahu has made it quite clear that his goal is the end of Palestine as a sovereign state. Quoted in the "Times of Israel" publication as saying:
  “in any future arrangement, or in the absence of an arrangement,” he said, Israel must maintain “security control” of all territory west of the Jordan River — meaning, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. “That is a vital condition.”
  He acknowledged that this “contradicts the idea of sovereignty [for the Palestinians]."
  Seeing as part of the definition of Genocide is to:
  destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group
  I would argue that falls under the definition as outlined by the 1948 Genocide Convention. Your focus on total eradication of people and culture is only a part of the definition of genocide. Also, they are certainly doing an unnecessary amount of eradication of Palestinians and their culture, regardless of if it is an "expressed intent".
  Lastly, "plausible" doesn't mean "just run with it", but I never said it did. Plausible means "plausible". As in, your argument that it "definitely isn't genocide" is directly contradicted by the ICJ ruling. People whose judgement the world put their faith in to make the distinction couldn't definitively say it wasn't occurring given the information they were given access to.
  Edit: need to add some clarity. It's not simply that Israel plans to end the nation state of Palestine. They are intending to end Palestinians as a National Group. This has been made clear by retorhic such as posted in this comment, as well as Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s statement during an Oct. 13 press conference. In his statement, Herzog said, “It’s an entire nation that is out there that’s responsible. It’s not true, this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved. It’s absolutely not true,”.
  Beyond that, according to Raz Segal, the program director of genocide studies at Stockton University:
  Israeli forces are completing three genocidal acts, including, “killing, causing serious bodily harm, and measures calculated to bring about the destruction of the group.” He points to the mass levels of destruction and total siege of basic necessities—like water, food, fuel, and medical supplies—as evidence.
  
  Between the denial of statehood and other political rights, and association with the last duly elected government as a blank check for murder, it sounds to me like israel's dick will not go any deeper into America's asshole. If they can take our money and do this to other people around the world in our name while we Americans work ourselves to death then our freedoms don't mean a thing until Netanyahu is removed from power.
  
  I’d imagine he doesn’t care if they leave Palestine , so long as he gets to have it- which means… he doesn’t care if they live or die so long as he get the land, which means…..
  IT’S NOT GENOCIDE.
  I’m done arguing this with you.
  
  It looks like you might be done arguing because you can't quite reconcile your belief that it's not a genocide with the fact that there's a clear intention to eradicate Palestine as a nationality, which fits one of the definitions of genocide, right?
  
  I’m done arguing because i don’t exercise futility. It’s a pointless debate. I don’t just make up the rules to things so they can fit my agenda because I have no agenda.
  I’ve no dog in that race and therefore have no bias. And having no bias allowed me to see it objectively and without any manufactured emotional outrage.
  It’s not genocide. By definition, or U.N. policy.
  
  I don’t just make up the rules to things so they can fit my agenda
  But that's exactly what you are doing. I presented the definition of Genocide (as outlined in the 1948 Genocide Convention), I also provided evidence that they are targeting Palestinians based on their Nationality, and that they are completing three genocidal acts, including, “killing, causing serious bodily harm, and measures calculated to bring about the destruction of the group.”
  Though if you need a more express proof than Netanyahu's statements to show they are committing their atrocities based on Nationality, here is another fun quote from Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s statement during an Oct. 13 press conference. In his statement, Herzog said,
  “It’s an entire nation that is out there that’s responsible. It’s not true, this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved. It’s absolutely not true”
  So let's just highlight in bold what Isreal has done that checks the genocide defintion boxes:
  Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:
  (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[7]
  You didn't contest that they were committing large scale atrocities such as "Killing members of the group based on their affiliation", that they were "Causing serious bodily and mental harm to members of the group", and that they were "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part". Nor did you contest the fact that they were targeting these actions based on national affiliation. So we have agreed that Israel sure has committed alot of the acts that define genocide, but to fit your agenda, you keep just repeating "IT'S NOT GENOCIDE", as if putting it all in caps makes less boxes be checked.
  
  I that's your definition of genocide, you'll have to call every war a genocide
  
  Well, technically it's the definition of Genocide as outlined in the 1948 Genocide Convention, but I am willing to accept their definition.
  Regardless, you can't think of (or even imagine) a war that wasn't fought to completely eradicate, in whole or in part, of a group based on a nationality, ethnicity, race or religion?
  
  I sure can and that's exactly the point: fighting to end a nation =/= genocide. Genocide = to eradicate a group of people
  
  Sure, but Israel isn't simply fighting to "end a nation" as in the nation state and it's government. They are targeting civilians and refugees, and trying to forcibly end the group identity that is Palestine. Saying that all Palestinians should relocate, and targeting non-combatants indiscriminately, based on nationality, is genocide.
  Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:
  undefined
  
  (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[7]
  Raz Segal, the program director of genocide studies at Stockton University, concretely says it is a “textbook case of genocide.” Segal believes that Israeli forces are completing three genocidal acts, including, “killing, causing serious bodily harm, and measures calculated to bring about the destruction of the group.” He points to the mass levels of destruction and total siege of basic necessities—like water, food, fuel, and medical supplies—as evidence.
  He says Israeli leaders expressed “explicit, clear, and direct statements of intent,” pointing to Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s statement during an Oct. 13 press conference. In his statement, Herzog said, “It’s an entire nation that is out there that’s responsible. It’s not true, this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved. It’s absolutely not true,” Herzog said. “They could have risen up, they could have fought against that evil regime which took over Gaza in a coup d'etat.” (Herzog later said that he is not holding the civilians of Gaza responsible for keeping Hamas in political power, when asked to clarify by a journalist at the same press conference.) Segal says that this language conflates all Palestinians as “an enemy population,” which could help prove intent.
  Edit: Also, after rereading my comments, I can see how I didn't make the through line clear, and thus why you assumed I simply meant that "wanting to remove a government = genocide", which it obviously does not. My intent was that the quote from Netanyahu regarding the intent to end Palestine as a sovereign state would show that, combined with my aforementioned comments regarding the large scale destruction and intentional targeting and displacement of civilians, their goal is the complete destruction of the group based on Nationality. That Palestinians would not only have lost the right to self-governance, but would be all killed or scattered throughout the world, absorbed into other cultures, and thus cease to exist.
  
  Would you think there is a difference between harassing your neighbours to the point they move, and lining them up against the wall and executing them?
  Do you think the Israelis would be satisfied if all the Palestinians packed their bags and resettled somewhere else?
- I thought it was Israel defending themselves against a terror attack. Apparently the goal posts have moved.
  
  Who said that?

249 comments