same bed length

You're viewing a single thread.

350 comments

I really like my 2003 Ford ranger. It's small, but can still haul enough that it works perfectly fine for when I'm picking up dirt for my garden. But also it's definitely not fuel efficient in the way that I'd want it to be. I wish they made something that size but newer.
- 2002 Tundra here. It is definitely the perfect size for a truck. However, now that it’s pretty old and beat up, and I’ve moved into a denser city, I think it’s getting time for something new :(
- I don’t think I’ve ever seen a small ranger
- I’ve been thinking a good business idea would be to make “restomod” Rangers. With luxury interiors and new engines with more fuel efficient setups. People do want them, but the chicken tax and CAFE makes it so Americans have no choice in trucks.
- I really like my two-and-a-half-tonnes death machine. It's small, but can still haul enough that it works perfectly fine for when I need to dispose bodies that I just ran over. But also it's definitely not fuel efficient in the way that I'd want it to be. I wish they made something that size but newer.
  
  My ranger is 3200 pounds.
  Edit: Just checked cuz I was curious, and that is only 300 lb more than the Tesla model 3. Your comment felt rude and unnecessarily aggressive. I hope you're having a good night.
- Small????
  
  It's sad to say, but that generation of Ford Ranger is way smaller than trucks from the last decade.
  
  I’ve never really been a truck guy, I also hate driving large vehicles in general and both preferences predate both my knowledge and even belief in climate change(I was raised as an evangelical in the south).
  If there was something like a Ranger or an S10 from the mid-late 90s with an electric motor I’d be all over it, fuck put out an electric El Camino and I’d rip my sleeves off on the way to the dealership
  
  There's kits to convert the old Rangers to electric I think and there was an electric model from the 90s sold only to Ford employees. You're definitely going to drop a ton on batteries though if you were trying to convert one yourself
  
  That’s because it’s a Mazda in ford clothing
  
  In the US at least, it's the other way around. The Ford Ranger is 100% Ford, while Mazda actually rebadged the Ford Ranger as the B series for the US market.
  
  TIL. Thanks for sharing buddy
  
  Man, I tried finding one of those cool websites where you can put like two cars together to compare their size. But it doesn't have the year of my ranger. But yeah, they're smaller than the new trucks by a lot. And they weigh about half as much. If you can get one of the older Toyota's or like a cool little Datsun, they're a little bit smaller, but really kind of in the mid 2000s was when trucks really started blowing up in size and absurdity.
  
  As in, not grotesquely oversized?
  
  Have you seen a 2003 Ranger? They’re objectively small unless you are comparing them to a mini cooper or an 80s Miata.

350 comments