TVs then vs TVs now

You're viewing a single thread.

232 comments

This is your nostalgia talking. CRTs were absolutely awful. I think my family still had one of lying around in the mid aughts. It was heavy, ugly, big, with truly awful picture quality and sucks down on power. Even the cheap LCD TVs we upgraded to were so much better than that crap.
- They're might be awful to you, but those people at CRT gaming community would literally dive into a dumpster if they spot a Trinitron/Wega there.
  
  I had to toss a Trinitron about a year ago. Was taking up too much space. I tried finding someone to pick it up with no takers, and had to junk it instead.
  It's not a large community.
  
  Damn.
  I’m happy with my old Apple color monitor for the IIe, but I would’ve happily taken it.
  I had to give up an early 1080p CRT recently. It broke my heart, but I have toddlers.
  They’re always messing with this 2lb giant flat thing. That would’ve crushed them if they had managed to knock it over. It needed a professional degaussing any way. Who the hell does that these days?
  
  I had an old Radio Shack bulk tape eraser that I got good at using as a degausser. Cable TV installer came in and moved my speakers too close to the TV and it cast an off color to the side. Tried my hand with the big electro magnet and got rid of the discoloration.
  
  Can confirm, I was just getting into it when someone was giving it away for free and arrived in time to see 2 people in a very heated argument that started to get physical... and I just got in my car and left.
- I had a monster sized CRT that would creak due to thermal expansion and would buzz when in use
  
  Oh man I'd forgotten about the weird hum some of them would make
  
  They also made a high pitched whine from the flyback transformer. My parents couldn't hear it but even as an adult I could.
  
  I was very sensitive to that noise. Walking down the street in my neighborhood, I could always tell when someone had a tv on in their house. My friends were amazed by that.
  My hearing isn’t what it used to be though.
- I agree, but the ones with the degauss button were fun.
  
  POINGngngngngng.
- Are you sure it was a CRT and not a projection TV? CRTs were limited in size, and they have a reputation for being between lcds and OLED in terms of picture quality (ignoring resolution). Projection TVs, on the other hand, had a reputation for being garbage and the only reason you'd buy one is because you wanted something bigger than a CRT could handle.
  
  There were big CRTs. They were just expensive. We had a Proton that was pretty big. Maybe 40"? There were bigger TVs, but we didn't have the money for them.
  
  There were 40+" CRT TVs (my father got one thrown in for free when he bought his place some years ago and kept usings it because "waste not") and those things had a big back and were pretty heavy, which makes sense because the entire screen area has to be covered by a single electron gun at the back, so bigger screen means it has to be further back as the angle of the electrons can be made to turn when they exit the electron gun is limited, plus it all has to be happenning in vacuum (so that gas molecules don't stop the electrons on their way to the screen) so you end up with the whole screen assembly being a big thick glass vacuum shell, so very heavy.
  Even the smaller CRT TVs had quite the big back, partly because of the whole electron gun and max angle thing but also because firing electrons in a vacuum requires more than 1000v, which have to be generated from mains on the TV, and high voltages means big chunky components (plus back in the day the components were naturally bigger than they are now for the same capabilities), so even the smaller screen ones were still quite large in the depth axis because of the space needed for high voltage electronics.
  Meanwhile the screens for LCD, OLED and so on are basically sandwiches of thin film forming a grid of cells that get activated/deactivated with reasonably small voltages (depends on the tech but if I'm not mistaken they're all less than 20v) with only the detail that those techs which do not emit light by themselves (such as LCD) need a bit more space for backlighting, all of which can be made way thinner than "enough depth for the electrons from an electron gun to reach the corners of the screen", much lighter than "requires a vacuum shell for all that space" and then again smaller and lighter because it doesn't have any high-voltage electronics inside.
- CRTs are great for retro gaming because they made low resolutions looking better than any other tech can (by low resolutions i mean 240-360p)
  
  Also, some Counter Strike players really enjoy playing on CRTs.
- Yeah they were all those things but they also made your hand tingly when you ran it over the screen and it smelled like a Tesla coil
- One of the problems is survivorship bias.
  The CRT's that survive today are mostly the cream of the crop. Professional monitors that were used for decades at local TV studios. HD CRT's from the 2000's that were some of the last ones made, were prohibitively expensive at the time, and have been lovingly cared for by enthusiasts.
  I think a lot of retro gaming enthusiasts who are in to CRT's today are either too young to actually remember what the average CRT was like or are old enough that they were enthusiasts back even in the 90's, only buying the absolute best of the best.
  I would literally take my phone over the console TV I grew up with in my parent's living room. I remember setting stuff down on it (it was pretty much a table), like an empty can, and the picture would go crazy. I think part of why we got rid of it was because my mom got new, wireless handsets for the landline phone that caused interference (and it was also around the time new technologies we're replacing CRT's).
  At one point as a kid i got a 19" Zenith CRT in my bedroom. That thing was absolute garbage. Colors all over the place, the image noisy and warped. It was loud, deeper than it was wide or tall, and weighed probably 40lbs. The only two inputs were RF and RCA, but only mono because it only had one speaker.
  I think most of the retro gaming community has just forgotten how bad the average CRT was.
  However, I also wonder if this demand for CRT's and that premium gaming experience is going to impact the market. Will there ever be enough demand for a Kickstarter to manufacture a few thousand high-end CRT's? Probably not. Could there be new features or new technologies invented to try to sate this demand? Maybe. Projector glasses, retro gaming handhelds, TV's and monitors with higher refresh rates, "gaming modes". I wonder if some other new tech is going to come along to try to capture the benefits of good CRT's in a modern package.

232 comments