1y ago

Google has sent internet into ‘spiral of decline’, claims DeepMind co-founder

www.telegraph.co.uk Google has sent internet into ‘spiral of decline’, claims DeepMind co-founder

The British entrepreneur says search results are plagued with ‘clickbait’

Google has plunged the internet into a “spiral of decline”, the co-founder of the company’s artificial intelligence (AI) lab has claimed.

Mustafa Suleyman, the British entrepreneur who co-founded DeepMind, said: “The business model that Google had broke the internet.”

He said search results had become plagued with “clickbait” to keep people “addicted and absorbed on the page as long as possible”.

Information online is “buried at the bottom of a lot of verbiage and guff”, Mr Suleyman argued, so websites can “sell more adverts”, fuelled by Google’s technology.

Technology @lemmy.ml

Google has sent internet into ‘spiral of decline’, claims DeepMind’ Mustafa Suleyman

www.telegraph.co.uk /business/2023/10/14/google-internet-spiral-of-decline-deepmind-mustafa-suleyman/

82 10

TechNews @radiation.party

Google has sent internet into 'spiral of decline', claims DeepMind co-founder

www.telegraph.co.uk /business/2023/10/14/google-internet-spiral-of-decline-deepmind-mustafa-suleyman/

1 0

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

196 comments

Makes sense, but yea it didn't really answer the overall question of "if it hits peak market penetration how will it avoid going the Google route" since google also started with the same premise. I suppose the answer is hope it doesn't become a monopoly
- It's also privately owned by one guy, so it doesn't have to submit to investor pressure.
  Steam, for example, is basically a monopoly for PC game sales, but hasn't enshittified because it is privately owned.
  
  While I agree that this does avoid enshitification, it's always possible for a privately owned company to IPO. That's why all of us are even here to begin with
  
  It's also certainly possible for a privately owned company (even one owned by a single individual) to undergo enshitification, it is only (if anything) less likely.
  
  It's probably as good as we are going to get.
  The best options would be an open source, donation supported search engine, but the money required to host/develop that is immense.
  We are all freeloading off of Lemmy right now, unless you are donating to the people who are running the servers. The cost to run a search engine is much higher though -- kagi pays (iirc) double digit cents for each search, even before development costs, with the average user doing 700 searches a month. The costs are way higher.
  
  They can't be spending $70 per user per month, let alone more than that, their pricing won't make sense
  
  I looked it up*
  https://blog.kagi.com/status-update-first-three-months#kagisearch
  It's $.0125, so 1.25 cents not double digits like I thought. They also average 27 searches per day per user. So an average of 821.25 searches per user per month, meaning a cost of $10.27 per month.
  
  Yeah, the number just stood out as too high to me

196 comments