1y ago

Average r/pics post

You're viewing a single thread.

90 comments

Btw even Finnish historians agree that the number is pure bullshit, made up for propaganda purposes. Soviet archives analysis confirms it, if it was real he would have to singlehandedly caused half of the losses of Soviet units located there.
- Don't tell finnaboos that, you'll cause a meltdown not seen since the formation of the Earth
  
  I already did few times and the effect was as you describe. Funnily enough, it's not even any tankie lore, even their beloved wiki mentions that.
  
  Was it some online squabble? I can't imagine anyone reacting much to it irl since most agree the stuff is exaggerated. It's a sore point or anything.
  
  Anticoms in Poland do mention Hayha a lot irl too if the talk goes anywhere near the topic.
  
  Like people enthusiastic about Finland or Finns? Because I wouldn't be surprised by the reaction from first group, whereas I'd be really surprised by the latter. I have some of the flag waving, Finnish lion wearing nationalistic friends and when we talked about it some time ago everyone agreed that the number is exaggerated and the discussion was more about by how much. I think some thought it was still really high and some were just unsure. Of course this is just my experience. Abroad those people might be more boastful hah
  
  There's tons of wehraboos in Poland and that usually include FInland too "Hayha killed 500 Russians singlehandedly" compiled with "Finland totally shows those commie cockroaches their place" etc. they love when someone kill Soviets and Russians so they always take the asspulled numbers like gospel.
  
  Ah. Partly that might be because Winter War and Finland's WW2 history is in that spot where people know a few (often exaggerated) tidbits that make them feel knowledgeable about it but not enough to really know stuff. In that context believing the 700 noscope 360's seems more reasonable. Hearing someone outside of Finland talk about Finland's history during WW2 is one of those cases where you're sure to hear a mistake or two. Hell, you can see it here in the comments. But a lot of it is imo pretty understandable.
  
  I think me and most Finns know it's exaggerated. That's usually brought up when talking about him. Most think he was impressive sniper but not that impressive.
- Fifty years from now: "The Ghost of Kiev was the deadliest top gun in history."

90 comments