Skip Navigation

You're viewing a single thread.

105 comments
  • Perhaps they’d have retained value if they had been attached to quality art rather than awful-looking algorithmically generated complete trash.

    • No, they wouldn't have. Because owning a link to a thing doesn't mean anything, no matter what that thing is. They were only valuable because people didn't understand NFTs and wanted to get rich quick.

      • The concept of a certificate of authenticity for digital goods that can be traded isn’t inherently terrible.

        • The concept isn't, I agree. But it also isn't a useful idea, either. There really doesn't appear to be any benefit to using NFTs in any meaningful application, or at least nobody has pitched one that isn't either a grift or a way to appear "trendy" by reinventing the wheel.

105 comments