What’s the point of unpopular opinions if you can’t show them off
What’s the point of unpopular opinions if you can’t show them off
What’s the point of unpopular opinions if you can’t show them off
You're viewing a single thread.
Damn i was downvited to oblivion by telling EV car batt arent reliable
Then i was telling those EV fanbois that Toyota has made the right decision to shift their RD in hydrogen rather than pussies heavies battery
Yea they did make a Hydrogen V8 engine !!!!
Hope is not lost
It make more noise with a enviro friendly engine !!!
Duh
Look at Siemens developing train that run on hydrogen
It called calorific content !!!!!!
Batt cant touch the level og hydrogen potential per volume
Plus they so heavy those ev car …they eill pollute more with specialized ture
Blah blah
Downvote me to helll.
I mean, I wouldn’t be surprised if most of the downvotes you receive are for your absurd use of punctuation lmao
XD savage!
Probably right. But tbh, whenever I see this, my assumption is either the user is in their 60s and unused to typing, or more likely they're typing in their non-native language and using the typical rules of their native one. And I'd feel shitty making fun of either.
It would be a better internet if that were everyone's first assumption, because I turn out to be correct way more often than not. A quick stalk through their profile proves it to be the second one — punctuation is handled with an extra space in French.
While this isn't supposed to be true of Canadian french, which is what they've claimed, I could see that still leaking into speech somehow and I'm kinda curious how it happened. Any québécois, how rigidly are English spacing rules adhered to?
The space is the least of it. It’s more the combination of using no periods, hitting enter after every thought, then using somewhere between 3 and 6 exclamation marks. Any one of these alone wouldn’t make me raise an eyebrow, but the combination makes it ridiculous.
The problems with hydrogen have never been with using it as a fuel source. The first problem is storage/transport of the fuel and the second is what happens to a vehicle with a hydrogen fuel tank when it's ruptured in an accident?
I can see a train making sense - a lot more space for storage and cooling, plus the risk of an accident is very low. But I haven't seen anything about these issues being addressed in motor vehicles.
Hydrogen takes a lot of energy to extract, transport, and store. It makes it orders of magnitude less efficient than simply using that energy to charge a battery directly.
pussies heavies battery
?