Microsoft Nintendo acquisition hopes revealed by leaked Xbox exec email
In the latest unredacted document oopsie stemming from the US Federal Trade Commission's efforts to stop Microsoft acqu…
In the latest unredacted document oopsie stemming from the US Federal Trade Commission's efforts to stop Microsoft acqu…
You're viewing a single thread.
Xbox games are on PC. Playstation games are on PC. Nintendo is Nintendo. If Microsoft ever bought out Nintendo, Nintendo would disappear, effectively making consoles obsolete. People will still buy consoles, but they would be pissing away their money.
There will always be a market for consoles. If you buy a game, know for a fact that it works. If you have a PC, it can start to be obsolete, or your graphics card might not be supported, or your OS might not be patched, or....
There will also always be a market for PCs, because you can do things cheaper, and/or better than consoles.
While I don't expect every single Xbox and PS owner to drop their preferred console in favor of PC, even though they should, those issues you listed as benefits of console over PC aren't real. Consoles become obsolete just like PC hardware, your graphics card might not be supported is the same situation, your OS might not be patched is not an issue whatsoever. It's just a shame that console owners think those things are issues.
But... you're wrong though. They are issues.
PCs slowly drift out of support for games. Over the years, some, but not all, of AAA games just don't work on your computer. Consoles have static generations where things either work or they don't. This is the pro and the con of the PC.
You simply do not have that problem with a PS4, it works for PS4 games. If you want a game that is only released for the PS5, then you buy a PS5.
I've never had a game stop working, ports to PC occasionally break but I've never had one just quit being compatible. Hell I can boot up early 90's games on my windows 10 machine right now right alongside early 2000's, 2010's, etc.
To do the same on console you'd have to have like five or six different console gens and their discs just laying around all over the place.
I have a PC where I could (and regularly) play almost every single game ever made, from Pong to Elden Rings. If I bought a PS5 today, I could only play games exclusively made for PS5 (not many, mind you), this also means a lot of PS1, through PS4, games that have never been ported are unplayable on a PS5. On my PC however, I can comfortably play almost every single game from every single generation of PlayStation up to PS4. I can also play every single AAA game ever released in history. Something that the PS5 cannot do, it only plays PS5 games.
PCs over the years are home to new operating systems that kill off older standards that run games (dos support, 64 bit architecture, etc) but that happens once every 20 years. With console gaming, it happens once every 6 years. If I want to play Half-Life 2, I can. If I had a PS5 and wanted to play GTA San Andreas, I couldn't.
Bad example on San Andreas. I have it on my PS5. And not the trilogy version.
But then again, I bought the PS4 version before the trilogy was released. So, I pull my opinion. Good example, dangblingus.
Xbox has backwards compatibility for games all the way back to the original Xbox. Not only is there backwards compatibility, but pretty much all those old games also get HDR support and some of the big ones like Red Dead Redemption and Mass Effect also got 4k textures for 10+ year old games, free of charge (don’t have to buy a remaster, etc)
Completely ignoring that collectors preserve computer games the same way they do consoles, and just preserve a computer with the necessary requirements.
And both those computers and those consoles are subject to deterioration which has been a large argument towards backing up games through emulation. While you may never want to good luck finding a working Atari Jaguar CD, and that's just one of the easier examples.
Nah man PC building is too much, I wanted to do it in my new place so I could run some emulators in my living room, thought I'd finally use Steam etc. but the prices to build are painful. I'll take a console and go without retro gaming for a bit.
I primarily play PS consoles. I prefer the controller. With today's technology and cross-platform play, I can still keep playing the controller that I like with friends I have developed over the years.
PC will be my way forward as I transition past this generation. I've been on Sony since the PS1 (I'm old). Plus, at least I can play the older PS1/2/3 titles on PC without a SUBSCRIPTION.
Heys guys, look! We've finally found him. The world's most well-informed gamer!
O' great Gamer, hallowed be thy name... please bless us peasants with yet another nugget of your immaculate gaming wisdom!
I'd love if they bought Nintendo, it would make me buy Xbox and whatever service I could use on a PC and Xbox. Their psn.
Nintendo suck. Their games get delayed, their consoles are mid. They literally only sell because of Mario and Zelda. That's why they absolutely drip feed that content. The only reason we're getting a new Mario Bros is because they'll announce a new console next year and they can re release it. And charge full whack because they have a captive market.
At least if Microsoft had Mario we'd get regular releases of new Mario games. That's all I want Nintendo for.
Their games get delayed because they actually finish them before release. They're one of the last AAA publishers who still believe in quality control. This is a very bad take.
It's not a very bad take, Sony does the same thing, we have 2 fully sledged open world Horizon Games and 2 incredible God of War games released in the time it's taken Nintendo to announce a Mario Bros platformer for their flagship device. Literally the most Nintendo game ever and they couldn't get one that wasn't a port on to the Switch
Odd examples to pick, Horizon Forbidden West and God of War Ragnarok were both delayed and the first original Mario platformer for the switch came out in 2017 (Odyssey - if you think 3d Mario games aren't platformers you haven't played them). Nintendo has also been releasing tons of other games as well so it's not like they've been doing nothing.
Also, to be fair, When you have a platform with 10 times the total sales (Wii U sold ~14m, the switch is at ~130m right now) it makes sense to port over the good games from the console no one owned. Mario Kart 8 deluxe, a game originally from the Wii U, has sold ~55m copies, which is about 4 times what the entire Wii U console sold. There's a reason they kept doing it, and it's because most of the Wii U titles were good games that people will enjoy which released on a dead platform.
If you're going to criticize Nintendo, criticize actually valid things like the scummy price increases on the ports (not just the ports' existence), the poor online system that costs up to $50 per year per account, and a legal team who goes after anyone doing anything that isn't directly playing the game. To be clear, a Microsoft buyout probably wouldn't change any of those things because it's making them money. Look no further than American companies like Disney largely using the same strategies Nintendo does. Microsoft is no different.
To be fair, the Switch has Super Mario Maker 2, which is the definitive 2D Mario platformer. The only real advantage that Wonder has is that the game isn't limited by the items in the game, and the trust that the levels are curated to be good. Otherwise Mario Maker is a superior product. It honestly feels weird to see Wonder being released at all.
Yeah I'm not sure if Wonder will be good, I mean probably because they have a high standard and all but still. I do think Maker is different in that the world design is unimportant, secret levels and Easter eggs etc. and there is zero curation. I actually gave up after a bit because I kept just getting ridiculous levels that were boring.
