1y ago

New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque

apnews.com New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has issued an emergency public health order temporarily suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque and surrounding Bernalillo County.

News @kbin.social

apnews.com /article/albuquerque-guns-governor-concealed-carry-fc5b4b79bf411b8022c3ad58975724d7

24 5

News @lemmy.world

New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque

apnews.com /article/albuquerque-guns-governor-concealed-carry-fc5b4b79bf411b8022c3ad58975724d7

219 45

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

199 comments

So if you skip breakfast you don't deserve the right to food? No lunch or dinner? Snacks ist verboten?
It clearly says the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed. You know you're wrong.
- You wrote a dumb shit sentence because the militia is the cause of the clause that follows in this stance, and in your example a breakfast is not the cause for keeping food but rather breakfast food.
  You made a bad example and declared it victory lol
  
  It's not a bad example, it's gramatically the exact same, and instead of admitting you're wrong you're choosing to stamp your feet like an obtuse child. You're free to do so, but everyone else is free to read your shame.
  Edit: wait, different person. You're choosing to stamp your feet on behalf of another* like an obtuse child, 'scuse me.
  
  You're posting in a public forum home slice.
  If you're intent on a private conversation, DMs are right there.
  
  No no, just clarifying, you're free to be wrong all you like as well.
  
  You're as bad at being witty as you are at being correct.
  
  No u.
- The hell is this weird strawman. Im not arguing against food im telling you how a sentence is written. As written, a balanced breakfast is the entire reason people have the right to food.
  
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/07-290P.ZO
  Sorry dude, keep studying both law and english.
  
  Oh wow, the supreme court interpreted the constitution differently than me. I had no idea, i thought they agreed with me and banned guns long ago.
  
  Well, you're wrong.
  
  our third world rates of gun homicide are wrong
  
  Yes, murder is wrong, regardless of weapon used.
  
  Nah im gonna regard the weapons used, which are guns
  
  You heard it here first folks, only gun murders count as "wrong." Murders done with knives, bats, bombs, etc? All A-OK in blazera's book, so find that coworker that microwaved fish last week and get after it!
  
  And this guy thinks everyone has a right to own bombs
  
  Well shit I guess "responsible bomb owners." That's why people can get licenses for that actually already, currently, right now in the United States of America today.

199 comments