2w ago

Epstein's fake Austrian passport from 1982

Source with some more pictures

You're viewing a single thread.

37 comments

I've seen this writer for a while so I don't know if it's AI written but it reads so much like it is it's incredibly distracting, I feel like I'm losing my mind these days doubting whether or not things are AI generated. I guess it doesn't really matter but this writing style makes me feel nauseous lately.
That’s the core fact that matters: this wasn’t just possession—it was a tool.
That is not how “just a rich pervert” moves. That is how an international criminal or intelligence asset moves.
Because this isn’t just about a passport. It’s about a pattern.
It tells you the concealment wasn’t a late adaptation. It was early architecture.
It is not the end of the story. It is the beginning of a more honest story.
Anyway though I wouldn't doubt he was connected to Mossad/MI6 or another agency, or a go-between for multiple agencies and other wealthy elite.
- The writer is Shaun King. A well-known scammer and grifter. I don't know why he's being linked to at Hexbear.
  Controversies
  Deleted false sexual assault accusation against Texas state trooper
  Jazmine Barnes shooting
  Fundraising activities and disputes
  Deleted Twitter post on depictions of Jesus
  Grassroots Law Project
  Claimed involvement in release of Israeli hostages by Hamas
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_King#Controversies
  
  Good god. I didn't know. I linked it because that is where I first saw the pics; it doesn't have anything of substance otherwise. I've replaced it with an archive of the justice.gov pdf which includes even more pictures.
  
  The writer is Shaun King. A well-known scammer and grifter. I don't know why he's being linked to at Hexbear.
  Because for every person that knows Shaun King is a grifter, there's a 1,000 others that do not.
  
  Hexbears are linking to Yotube vids with AI and Substacks by horrible people. I don't think it's much to ask that this little corner of the internet be at least a wee bit better than Reddit. And what that requires is effort by the posters not to link to such stuff.
  
  https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talcum_X
  (slang, humorous, derogatory) Shaun King.
  Synonyms: Hueless P. Newton, Martin Luther Cream, Thurgood Partial
  
  Oof.
- Emdash plus "not just X, but Y"
  yeahhh
- it's incredibly distracting, I feel like I'm losing my mind these days doubting whether or not things are AI generated.
  I've had that feeling from Youtube vids posted at Hexbear. I started going into the comments first to see what people had to say. I don't watch that many Youtube vids via Hexbear but in just the last few days I ended up at 3 vids with AI narration. It's very disappointing. I expect more from this site. The most recent vid was trivia about a very silly 1970s comedy movie called "The Big Bus". The voice even had the wonky "p" sound that results from people not quite mic'ing themselves correctly.
  After about 4 minutes I had had enough. The narration was like milk that seemed okay but left a spoiled aftertaste. And as time goes on and AI starts to make more and more of stuff we'll end up questioning everything. How many facts are fake? How much text is fake? How many of the images are fake? Of course right now on the fly AI can't generate fake 1970s-like movie footage. I knew "The Big Bus" footage was real. But years from now AI surely be able to make up all sorts of seemingly real nonsense after the "creator" types a bit and pushes some buttons.
  AI could make up something seemingly real like the "The Huge Plane" an entirely fake 1970s comedy with fake details like "starring Burt Reynolds" and then show Reynolds in some scenes.
- I don't know if it's AI written but I found it rather repetitive.
  
  It's so obviously AI it hurts. Real people very rarely use "It's not x, it's y" sentence construction. AI fucking spams that shit.
  It's either AI or it's someone who has read so much AI slop that they have basically turned their brain into ChatGPT
  
  I don't think it's that rare for people to use that sentence structure, but it's insane just how frequently AI uses it. I have to wonder if it's another case of AI inbreeding at this point.
  
  It does have the hallmarks of AI text or someone who spends most of their time writing clapbacks on social media, which you know, one learned from the other.
- 100% AI
- Either way it's a lot of filler.

37 comments