I_fucking_hate_them_now
I_fucking_hate_them_now

I_fucking_hate_them_now

You're viewing a single thread.
Now I'm imagining a shell that looks iteratively through arguments to find where quotes would make total sense
undefined
$ ls my victims.ods $ wipe -f my victims.ods --thorough
So the shell would go like
wipe → command name found, ok -f → no file in the current directory starts with that, skip my → matches a file, keep in memory... my victims.ods → full match, but missing quotes! undefined
Filename "my victims.ods" found without quotes. Choose: [a]dd quotes this time [A]lways add quotes (dangerous) [n]o quotes today please [N]ever offer adding quotes again [t]ell me what could possibly go wrong when I choose to always add quotes [P]unch the person who proposed this feature
For interactive use, tab-completion essentially makes this a non-issue, because shells add escaping in the appropriate places.
For scripting, where spaces are harder to deal with, unfortunately there's just not much you can do; your two options are basically to learn all of your particular shell's patterns for dealing with whitespace in filenames, or only write scripts in something other than a POSIX shell.
Scripting isn't the issue, but for tab completion: the boundary is often at a space or parenthesis so that you need to type the backslash + char to continue tabbing to completion
Believe me, whitespace-correct scripting is absolutely an issue.
You're right that it's annoying when filenames diverge right at a character that must be escaped.