Exploring Left-Wing Extremism on the Decentralized Web: An Analysis of Lemmygrad.ml
Exploring Left-Wing Extremism on the Decentralized Web: An Analysis of Lemmygrad.ml
Discovered in Fediverse Report – #129
您正在查看单个线程.
100 留言
-
The authors give away their ideology when they conflate anti-Zionism with anti-semitism.
If you think Zionism is a good thing, you’re supporting genocide.
-
Where do they conflate it? Here's an excerpt from the quote they provide as an example of antisemitism:
Everyone identifing as a jew is a zionist and an enemy of the communist and anti imperialist movement.
-
You are a zionist if you support a two-state solution.
-
What a bunch of bs
-
How so?
-
Herzl admited that he wanted the palestinians out like i mentionned in other comment. You are a zionist if you believe that zionists has eternal right to the land because of a two year old kingdom
-
I don't think that. But I do think Israel has a right to exist.
-
Today yes but before it creation no, because zionists was imigrants that wanted to force a state by ethenically cleansing local population. It's still ok to believe in a one state with equal right too
Does palestine has a right to exists too?
-
Yes
-
Zionists do not support it , they always refused to give back all the land that was occupied by israel in 67 those land are palestinians under international law and do not support a one state solution either that would allow israeli and palestinian in the whole land of mandate palestine and live together with equal rights
-
There's a lot wrong with what you just said. But we'll poke into Mandate Palestine. So if these Zionists weren't supportive of allowing Palestine to exist, then why would they be supportive of the initial UN-resolution that promised just that, equality for two states?
-
Zionists knew that palestinians the local population wouldn't accept to give up 55% of their land to recent imigrants owning only 9% of the land. Certain arabs also suggested a one state solution from the beginning which no zionist supported back then. Yoy also like to only read whst you want i told you that ben gurion ssid he want the whole land
If zionists really wanted peace they wouldn't have occupied gaza and the west bank in 67, they wouldn't support illegal settlements in west bank, they wouldn't still call west bank as judea.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Technically true. I am therefore a Zionist. That doesn't mean I want to see Israel expand into Jordan or even expand settlements in the WB.
-
You are no zionist if you oppose settlements in west bank because zionists believe any part of old jewish kingdoms belong to them
-
Me neither
But too often is zionist used as a dog whistle for jew.
-
It is scary that we have made humans into political topics.
-
Always have been
-
-
How do you know it is most of the time and not just sometimes? It's like saying science often used for bad things like some racists was trying to use science to proof that white people are superior
-
Most of the time it's pointing out dog whistles and common slogans antisemites use to identify one another while also radicalising "normies"
It's difficult
-
Stilñ waiting for evidence about it being most of the time rather thsn sometimes
-
Okay, sure. So, an example is the red arrow; you've probably seen some Twitter users or Hexbear users have the red arrow when referring to zionists.
This red arrow is a reference to Hamas propaganda videos, which in of itself is a reference to the Holocaust A "normie" would never know this, but extremists and antisemites can use it to identify one another while handwaving those who point out the dog whistle, 'Oh, it's just an arrow, don't be so paranoid.'
-
Tsnkies are not the whole world show me surveys
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ireland is trying to redefine "genocide" to include Gaza & Ukraine situations.
-
"Redefine" when it's calling it what it is.
Fuck off.
-
most of the ukranians in crimea still live there after the almost bloodless coup. don't tell me you haven't thought this through. the irish must be huffing too much amazon money. how is it putting one foot in front of another? we call it walking
-
-
It didn't redefine anything. Yes both are genocides based on the legal definition
-
-
And you give away your ideology with this comment. You are the extreme they are talking about.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command"
- 1984
You reject this paper solely because it might go against your own beliefs. You don't need to agree with every thing everyone publishes. It is important to keep your mind open instead of taking anything that might make your question your beliefs as a personal attack. Stop with the us vs them and start thinking for yourself.
-
You would a reject an article from an pro russian media too
-
100 留言