this is why schools still assign upton sinclair
this is why schools still assign upton sinclair
(and why conservatives hate public schools, ofc)
this is why schools still assign upton sinclair
(and why conservatives hate public schools, ofc)
You're viewing a single thread.
It's fine, just list it as "cellulose" on the ingredients list.
(It's not technically sawdust anymore after processing, but it's still gross even though it's food-safe.)
It's free fiber!
I mean, it's not free, but yes, edible sawdust would be good for the health of most people in the western world. Though they tend to get cellulose from cheaper sources like straw or chaff.
Well they sure aren't eating vegetables so might as well shove some sawdust replacement down their throats.