"Anarchism is not about [...] class or opposing archists"
Are Lemmy anarchists okay? How does this person have 24 upvotes? In what universe are anarchists NOT doing class analysis, (therefore) don't want to abolish capitalism, and don't want to fight archism?
I suspect this is just because libs absolutely DESPISE comrade @Cowbee@hexbear.net and will upvote anything smart-sounding that supposedly addresses whatever is being discussed?
Also, gotta love the whole "I have this opinion and many anarchists will disagree and that's what anarchism is about". Like, buddy, you haven't read one book or talked to one anarchist IRL, let alone organized in your entire life.
You're viewing a single thread.
280 comments
no em-dashes
it's not x, it's y two times in a paragraph
Kinda of a head scratcher on whether this is AI or not
It's not. see: BIbble-Bubble-Bum-Fuck.
I'm trying to get across Ideas and for that writing in a universal style, which is what LLMs are trained on, is the most useful. The fact that you can't tell the difference show's that I'm LLM level. Which could either mean LLMs have gotten worse or I'm as good as a computer in writing. It's probably the former.
Alas my talk machine-coded appear, this shall not do. humanity prove i will. talk giberish, yes, but still understand. like words. they weird. they mashed but still mean. me like that. me wieeeeerd. Why talk good when can talk fun?
universal style
How many layers of ethnocentrism are you on?
Point taken. Don't refer to writing styles as universal.