“Extreme Danger”: Harris Earns a Stunning Endorsement Over Trump

www.yahoo.com “Extreme Danger”: Harris Earns a Stunning Endorsement Over Trump

Kamala Harris has earned an eleventh-hour show of support from Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim community leaders.

More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.

“We know that many in our communities are resistant to vote for Kamala Harris because of the Biden administration’s complicity in the genocide,” the letter, published Thursday night, reads.

“Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon. We respect those who feel they simply can’t vote for a member of the administration that sent the bombs that may have killed their loved ones,” the letter continued. “As we consider the full situation carefully, however, we conclude that voting for Kamala Harris is the best option for the Palestinian cause and all of our communities.”

You're viewing a single thread.

296 comments

How is her getting this endorsement over Trump stunning? It's a no-fucking-shit development
- Because somehow there are Muslims and Arab-Americans who have convinced themselves that voting for the guy who instituted the "Muslim Ban" and called their countries "shitholes" is better than voting for Harris.
  There is a reason why Netanyahu and his war cabinet haven't listened to people (including in Biden's administration) pushing a cease fire. It's because Netanyahu knows that if Trump wins, he will have permission to "finish what he started" in Gaza. Then Trump and Kushner will build golf courses there with Saudi money.
- Because for people who lost loved ones in Gaza thanks to American aid and weapons, with her agreement and approval, it’s a painful thing for them to give.
  And a clear indication of how terrifying the prospect is, for them, of what Trump might do to their loved ones, if he gets in.
  
  Unfortunately it is not that. Notice the description of the letter signatories and their associations.
  First, it is not just Palestinians. It is likely they would have 10% of the signatories if they had that requirement. It is Palestinians, Arabs, "Progressive Democrats", and "Community Leaders".
  Second, it is the usual constellation of party groups and the heads of NGOs, I.E. people heavily personally invested in the party apparatus and toeing the line.
  While I am sure some feel all kinds of negative emotions, at the end of the day these are largely self-intrtested climbers. You will recognize the type if you do work in this space. They always pop up when you try to organize substantial changes, they cooedinate with the party for PR purposes.
  
  The names are listed. Most are Palestinian.
  I’m glad you feel empowered to judge who are the real Palestinian voices, who gets to speak, and who’s a “largely self-interested climber” who feels that talking about the genocide in Gaza and playing up their Palestinian heritage is a really good way to get ahead in American politics. Without you to give me guidance, I might have fallen into taking this thing at face value.
  Can you tell me more about some of these individual self-interested climbers? Some that you know, who and why specifically you already know that they’re not worth listening to? I’m sure you wouldn’t accuse someone of selling out their own country in the middle of a genocide just because of some vague notions (“you will recognize the type” and so on.) You clearly have some specific reason you can identify these specific people as being dishonest, when they sign this letter. Right?
  
  The names are listed. Most are Palestinian.
  Most are not labeled as Palestinian. Some are from Orgs that say Palestinian in the name, but that ia not the same thing by a long shot.
  I’m glad you feel empowered to judge who are the real Palestinian voices
  Yes it is the overwhelming number of everyday Palestinians demanding the end of genocide carried out by the Biden-Harris administration. It is the number of Palestinians I have personally turned out to actions that is far larger than this list. And that is just my personal experience in one place. They had to pad their numbers with none Palestinians and throw the net across an entire staye, focusing on NGOs. Yes I do get to judge this PR bullshit. It is just basic critical thinking and knowledge of the context. You should judge this bad-faith tokenization as well.
  who gets to speak
  I have never told anyone whether they get to speak. Please kindly retract and apologize for this invented falsehood.
  and who’s a “largely self-interested climber”
  Yes it is the heads of Democratic Party - associated NGOs and party orgs. If you have any experience with these kinda of organizations you will be fully familiar with how they operate.
  who feels that talking about the genocide in Gaza and playing up their Palestinian heritage is a really good way to get ahead in American politics.
  Such NGOs and party organizations are constant feeders for tokenizing marginalized identities and promoting party loyalists with those identities. This is in no way new nor is it rare. This is basic party politics for the last 60 years.
  Can you tell me more about some of these individual self-interested climbers?
  As the head of Dem-associated NGOs they will inevitably be exactly that. That is how you gain and retain those positions and ensure continual funding for you and your staff. I have both worked for and opposed and radicalized workers from these kinds of organizations for many years. Generally speaking, they keep a low profile outside of their official actions that are usually relatively tempered. They are either protecting their org and position or they are planning to run for office and are absolutely obsessive about how their career and "past activities" will appear. Fundamental material interests dictate behaviors that anyone who has actually worked in these spaces will immediately recognize. It is conspicuous how this list is curated.
  Some that you know, who and why specifically you already know that they’re not worth listening to?
  Why do I specifically need to know Arizonan NGO heads to know how they operate? I have lived and operated in many states, it is the same all over.
  I’m sure you wouldn’t accuse someone of selling out their own country in the middle of a genocide just because of some vague notions (“you will recognize the type”)
  They don't need to think of it as selling out. Many will not. People like this rationalize their self-interest with feeling like they're fighting the good fight. But they ultimately know that this list is an exercise in party loyalty and they know who butters their bread.
  "You will recognize the type" is not a vague notion. It is understanding a subclass of our society, the heads of party-connected NGOs, which is 100% not your average person. It is as if you saw a letter of 50 latino CEOs telling you that lower wages are better for latinos. Are you just going to accept that or are you going to understand that CEOs are bound to profit-driving organizations that benefit from paying less for work? Do you need to know the CEOs personally to understand their material interests and social role? Does every one of those CEOs need to be twirling a mustache and cackling all the while? Can some of them be true believers that are also self-interested and have and maintain their positions because of how they function in the system? I've also known CEOs. Most think of themselves as good people that are very smart
  You clearly have some specific reason you can identify these specific people as being dishonest, when they sign this letter. Right?
  Please stick to what I actually say, thank you.
  
  I don't want to continue this conversation. You are lying.
  Read the letter. It says more eloquently than I could, what is the massive difference between "everyday Palestinians demanding the end of genocide weapons for which are supplied by] the Biden-Harris administration," which of course makes perfect sense and is something I wholeheartedly support, after the important edit I've made on your behalf, versus everyday Palestinians who are okay with the utter disaster even beyond the present unspeakable disaster, that would be Trump coming to power.
  I looked up some polls, I looked up who are some of the people on this list and their background. You're wrong, and lying. I don't even need to speak on it, because as a non-Palestinian I don't have the authority on it that the people who already wrote a letter for you do. It's already been said.
  If you want to keep talking to me, let's talk about: Is genocide in Xinjiang a red line?
  
  I don't want to continue this conversation.
  Then why write 3 more paragraphs?
  You are lying.
  Ah yes, unjustified accusations of lying. Great.
  Read the letter.
  I read it yesterday and have already critiqued it several times.
  It says more eloquently than I could, what is the massive difference between "everyday Palestinians demanding the end of genocide weapons for which are supplied by] the Biden-Harris administration," which of course makes perfect sense and is something I wholeheartedly support, after the important edit I've made on your behalf,
  Rather than playing around editing my quotes, why not just be direct and honest? It sounds like you are trying to say you don't think the Biden-Harris regime is committing genocide and that it should be more restrictiveky stated as " supplying weapons". Unfortunately, this would be both false and misleading.
  The US does not merely "supply weapons", it donates them. Israel is wholly dependent on the US for these weapons. The genocide could not happen without them and all parties know this. In the middle of genocide, the Biden-Harris regime continues to provide unrestricted weapons to Israel, including bypassing Congress to ensure that there is no pause or lack of stockpiles.
  And of course, providing weapons is not the beginning or end of US support for the genocide. It is an effort to list the many different ways. The US provides logistical support to Israel, including military support. That "aid" pier? It was used as part of the "rescue operation" for a handful of Israelis where hundreds of Palestinians were killed. Israeli bombing intel? The US is flying P8 Poseidons all over the regikn, particularly Lebanon, and shares satellitr imagery on a constant basis. The Houthis standing in solidarity with Palestine? The US ramps up its own genocidal campaign against them (remember Yemeni kids?) and thank God they are failing. The US is sending not just THAAD batteries, but personnel to run them. The US strongarms support for Israel as best it can and threatens those who work against the genocide in Gaza. They immediately started a campaign against South Africa once they brought allegations to the ICJ. The US continues to make direct and substantial monetary donations to the Israeli state. Domestically, the US cracks down on protests against the genocide. They send cops to intimidate and beat us (funded by Biden!), university administrations funded by the feds expel and deport students. The Biden-Harris administration just designated Samidoun a terrorist organization. Samidoun organizes orisoner support and Gaza solidarity peotests around the country. While Samidoun denies the allegation, the claim is that they support the PFLP, which is a resistance organization similar to the ANC, which the US labeled, along with its member Joseph Mandela, a terrorist organization.
  Please understand that you have much to learn on this topic. And when you have much to learn, I think the bare minimum is that you, by default, oppose genocide.
  versus everyday Palestinians who are okay with the utter disaster even beyond the present unspeakable disaster, that would be Trump coming to power.
  The heads of NGOs and party insiders are not "everyday", that is obviously my point. It is conspicuous that this is their list.
  I looked up some polls, I looked up who are some of the people on this list and their background. You're wrong, and lying. I don't even need to speak on it,
  It is generally good practice to support accusations of lying and incorrectness with a rationale, maybe even evidence.
  because as a non-Palestinian I don't have the authority on it that the people who already wrote a letter for you do. It's already been said.
  I don't remember seeing, "TheOubliette is lying and wrong" in that letter. Maybe you can point me to which line it is on?
  But please, don't tokenize Palestinians. You have a responsibility to be against genocide yourself, to become informed and not lash out. You cannot rely on any Palestinian to do this for you, let alone allow yourself to be manipulated by a list of party insiders and NGO heads. Be among the people. Read the history. Understand the violence.
  If you want to keep talking to me, let's talk about: Is genocide in Xinjiang a red line?
  I will gladly discuss this in a different thread but I have decided that this would be a distraction in this one. Please center the genocide of Palestine with your words and actions.
- More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.
  Agreed. I am not stunned by this. "We have to pick the less shitty option" is not new, and it does not interest me. I'd be interested in, say, the world actually getting better, rather than just getting worse at either a slower or faster speed.
  
  Yeah but that’s not the choice offered to you. And you can only make the choices you are offered.
  
  Not true. That is the self - disempowerment that these kinds of messages are meant to promote. But you can do more than and something other than vote for genociders and tell other people to vote for genociders.
  You can deligitimize support for genocide, for example. That is a small thing to do, but it I'd also what this self-disempowerment is intended to prevent. Beyond that, you can join pro-Palestinian orgs that identify the US and Israel as the agents of genocide and who work to build power based on coalition-building, mass engagement, and education rather than NGO-style funding and bureaucracy and self-promotion for its leadership.
  
  That is the perspective of one who does not see beyond conditioned existence.
  
  You can vote for the least worst candidate, and also work to build momentum for the radical change we actually need. Just withholding a vote doesn't achieve anything. The political class isn't going to look at low turnout and say "damn, elections are getting unpopular, we'd better revolutionize the political system." Vote, and also work on building popular support for real change.
  
  and also work to build momentum for the radical change we actually need
  Humans tend to prefer money to compassion. And that money comes from business practices that make the world less suitable for humans to live in. I think humans will kill themselves before they love each other.
  
  Yes, absolutely. One must work for justice, not support those who actively work against us.
  
  we've been picking the less shitty options for generations and it's painted us into this corner of a choice between a democrat genocide enabler and a republican who wishes he could.
  what indication is there that doing the same thing we've always done will make things better?

296 comments